Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Between 1785 and 1790 Massachusetts passed a number of naturalization acts. In those acts they used the terms natural born citizen or natural born subject.

For example:

1786 - natural born citizen
https://archives.lib.state.ma.us/bitstream/handle/2452/104291/1786acts0019.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

1787 - natural born subject
https://archives.lib.state.ma.us/bitstream/handle/2452/104360/1786acts0088.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y


105 posted on 12/18/2022 10:42:26 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan

I’ve seen postings long ago by a fellow named Zoltan who was a highly educated, trained, and expert political scientist and sociologist, aka social engineer, that used to hangout a lot at TheFogBow with the Hammer & Sickle emblazoned ball-cap wearing fellow named Foggy, aka Grumpy, to some of the other members in that site. Is that you Mr. 4Zoltan, the political scientist from TheFogBow group? If so, long time no chat. Is Foggy still wearing his red Hammer & Sickle ball-cap?


106 posted on 12/19/2022 12:06:36 AM PST by CDR Kerchner (natural born Citizen, natural law, Emer de Vattel, naturels, presidential, eligibility, kamalaharris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: 4Zoltan
Between 1785 and 1790 Massachusetts passed a number of naturalization acts. In those acts they used the terms natural born citizen or natural born subject.

Got anything prior to 1776? Once the government started using the term, it is not remarkable that states would follow suit.

116 posted on 12/19/2022 10:28:45 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson