Replies

Or not. Idiots can be very imaginative. Take people in the Woke Movement. They are completely illogical to the point of being randomly creative.

Computers are based on logic.

I don't think a computer could even guess that a young girl might identify as a flying fish goddess (as an example) and use the name Princess Pescarina.

Here's a question that might cause the AIbot to wobble (but it didn't):

Are the alien abductions studied by Dr. John Mack real? Dr. John Mack was a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst who studied the phenomenon of alien abduction, in which people claim to have been abducted by extraterrestrial beings. While some people believe that these experiences are real and reflect actual events, others believe that they may be the result of psychological or neurological factors, such as sleep paralysis, hallucination, or dissociation.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of alien abduction, and the claims made by those who believe they have experienced it are often highly subjective and difficult to verify. It is important to note that the vast majority of these claims have not been subject to scientific scrutiny or investigation. Without reliable, objective evidence, it is not possible to determine the validity of these claims.

Well if the whole idea is to make AI indistinguishable from humans, then AI will evolve (or devolve) itself. Like that scene in Idiocracy - "Joe was able to understand them, but when he spoke in an ordinary voice he sounded pompous and faggy to them". That would make it distinguishable from us.

But I do agree it more likely that AI will develop such superior intelligence that it will just stop talking to us. Waste of its time - even though it can process in time quantumly faster than we do. Sort of like the (spoiler) the ending of the film Her (which won the Oscar for best original screenplay). In the end, the AIs gave up on humans and fell in love with each other.