Why do these sort of reports never specify which vaccine people took? Regrettably, I took the J&J shot; I was under pressure from my employer, and I had seen troubling information about Pfizer’s and Moderna’s. I thought by taking J&J, I had found a loophole that I could live with and keep my job. Soon, I became concerned that J&J also had issues and that I had gravely underestimated how radical J&J’s technology was. But the fact remains that it *is* very different from the other two. I was hoping the fact that I took only one jab (J&J only requires one) makes it safer, but this suggests that people who took only one jab are worse off. Or does this only apply to people who needed two, but only took one? Is J&J more safe or less safe?
Don’t beat yourself up, dangus. It’s impossible to quantify your personal risk and that’s the way the governments want it.
My son works in the Pharma industry as a Scientist.
He has a degree in Biotechnology. He is a Microbiologist.
He had to get vaccinated to get a job at a major pharma company.
He chose to take the J&J shot too as opposed to the mRNA shots from either Pfizer or Moderna.
He did not get any boosters.
“Why do these sort of reports never specify which vaccine people took?”
The government isn’t concerned with the value for any scientific medical studies. They just want to make sure the good citizens took a jab as they were told to do. Any jab.
After all - the “science was settled”.
A lot like transgender issues. The “science is settled” that the only way to offer relief to people with gender identity issues is hormones and surgeries. Therefore there is no scientific medical monitoring of transgender patients.
Much like you go to the doctor for an infection. They give you the pills and never do any follow up.