[smileyface]

Is it possible that so many vaxxed that survived the single jab are the ones who will suffer with cancers and disabilities that prolong life but not health? Thus making the deaths appear less in double/triple jabbed as death isn’t immediate.
```````
Mebbe.

Perhaps the single jabs were effective at eliminating the already weak/compromised. The strong survived for another jab.

Did I just restate what you proposed?

[nclaurel]

Perhaps the single jabs were effective at eliminating the already weak/compromised. The strong survived for another jab. Did I just restate what you proposed?

The strong who survived for more jabs will die more slowly from cancers and all the other more long term illnesses so the death tolls will be more spread out maybe over a few years. But the deaths were still initiated by the jabs.

[LittleLinda]

Is it possible that so many vaxxed that survived the single jab are the ones who will suffer with cancers and disabilities that prolong life but not health? Thus making the deaths appear less in double/triple jabbed as death isn’t immediate.
_____________________________________________________

I watched a roundatable discussion among Drs. Ryan Cole, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, and renowned insurance analyst Josh Sterling (et al.). Below is the explanation Josh Sterling gave for the single vaccinated experiencing a 145% increase in death:

The people who took only the first dose were the ones who were disproportionately harmed from the start. They were the ones who experienced the most dangerous side effects and decided not to continue with the second dose. The 145% higher chance of mortality is because the vast majority of these people were already significantly injured from the first jab. This is the situation as it stands today without any treatments, cures or interventions on the horizon, so maybe it will change.

It’s easier to understand this devastating statistic when we hear the stories of vaccinated but outwardly well people collapsing and dying. They had no symptoms or evidence of injury and they still died from invisible injuries from the jabs. Now imagine being visibly injured after the first jab. It becomes clearer why the chance of mortality is so much higher in this group.