Replies

Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
·
10m
A standard response to the concern about Biden pressuring Twitter is that Trump did the same thing. That’d be valid if there’s *any* evidence to suggest Trump had the same influence as Biden, but the real story is the extraordinary lengths to which Twitter went for just one side.

I’m open-minded to the symmetric concern in the other direction if there’s even a shred of evidence that Twitter or any other major social media company censored a damning, potentially outcome-altering piece of accurate information at Trump’s request. None yet, I’m still waiting.

Richard Grenell
@RichardGrenell
·
2h

Imagine winning a Pulitzer for a fake news story you fell for - and then ignoring the
@elonmusk
revelations that your employer interfered in the 2020 election by suppressing a candidates’ actual ties to a communist country.

@maggieNYT should give the Pulitzer back.

From their website, pasted below, they say vaxed blood has particles in it. I would imagine part of the screening is that they look at it with a microscope. Better than taking someone’s word for it!

“Blood transfusions are carried out using blood preserves, which go through a complex process after the blood donation in which they are largely cleaned of foreign bodies. The blood obtained in this way could be used for transfusions without hesitation – until now.

With the advent of the completely new mRNA vaccinations (such as currently the Covid vaccinations) we have completely new challenges here, since not only the so-called spike proteins are neutralized to an unknown extent only. According to the current state of science, a large number of undeclared non-organic additives in these vaccinations are only partially eliminated by the known cleaning methods. Dark field microscopy shows the presence of these particles in the blood even after at least 6 months – some of them can never be broken down at all.”

I got a reply back to my email from the safe blood people, I asked if I needed to pay to be a donor. Harris about the reply was:

no, you don’t have to pay to be a donor, but you have to pay to be a potential receiver, and as such, a member. however, it is up to you how much it is worth to you, to have an organisation like us. we hope you never need us - but you never know…

answers to your questions are here: https://safeblood.us/en/location/news-from-the-countries/usa/

and here:

please subscribe to our telegram channel https://t.me/safeblood_en, where you always find the latest news.

good day

USA: same here, plenty of interest and an amazing team slowly coming together, but no local office yet, but we are working on it. let us know if you want to help
the USA is a very special case because most hospitals already allow you to choose your blood donor in all states. they won’t tell you, but if you insist, they will let you choose. that’s amazing, which means we can start matching right away, and once we have enough members, we will be able to supply the entire USA with potential blood donors. we don’t have to wait for anything else, like in europe, etc. - and along with the living will of our members (in the member area), the chance for us to have to get vaccinated blood is getting smaller by the day. so please, become a member and help us build a USA-wide network of blood donors. so for now the focus is clearly on mediation.
the next step, starting our own blood bank, will take much more time and effort because there are still many hurdles to overcome, but we are working on it.
CANADA, ICELAND, SWEDEN: finally the cold countries have found us too. no teams yet, but in the process of setting up - in canada we are in the process of teaming up with some amazing personalities already involved in important canadian health freedom groups.