Thanks for the post. I hope that this means something to the judge.
zerohedge
@zerohedge
·
22s
ZELENSKIY SAYS REGARDLESS OF CHANGES IN U.S. CONGRESS, HE IS CONFIDENT UKRAINE WILL CONTINUE TO ENJOY BIPARTISAN SUPPORT
*BIDEN: NOT WORRIED ABOUT HOLDING COALITION TOGETHER FOR UKRAINE
More of Lake v Hobbs......
Kari Lake War Room
@KariLakeWarRoom
·
1h
Testimony from our Chain of Custody expert:
In response to records requests, Maricopa County provided early voting chain of custody records for every day BUT election day.
·
1h
Chain of Custody expert when asked if she had all of the Maricopa County delivery receipt documents.
“We do not have any. We requested them but they said they had misplaced them.”
FOLLOW UP: Those are the ones for election day?
“We didn’t get a single one of those for the entire election. It is in the declaration of the Runbeck employees that no such documents existed for election day.”
Runbeck employees describe trucks coming in with no corresponding documentation.
No chain of custody was kept during this transport.
When Runbeck reached out to Maricopa County they said it wasn’t “necessary.”
This is the complete breakdown of election law.
Remember the participation of Runbeck in this process AT ALL is already in violation of Arizona State statute.
Couple that with the fact that ballots were dropped off, counted(?), and taken out with NO documentation.
Whistleblowers at both MTEC and Runbeck confirm that the legal chain of custody was not followed.
No documentation taken, personal items like handbags and purses allowed into the room
Let’s break this down for our friends in the media.
Whistleblowers from Point A (Runbeck) & Point B (MTEC) describe a total lack of chain of custody during transport from A to B.
Arizona laws say Point A shouldn’t exist at all.
All of those ballots are compromised.
This stuff is needlessly complicated.
We’re finding out those needless complications are by design.
Maricopa County doesn’t want you to know how the process works.
Because the process doesn’t work at all.
According to the Arizona EPM (Arizona Election Procedures Manual), @Stephen_Richer was LYING when he testified under oath that he was not responsible for oversight of the drop boxes on election day.
Either that or he doesn’t know what his job is. Is that any better?
.
@StephenRicher excused what happened on Election Day by saying mail in voting is far safer than election day voting
By “safer” he means at least six additional steps & multiple potential breakdowns of the chain of custody have to occur before your ballot is ready to be counted
Kari Lake
@KariLake
·
1h
WATCH: Chain of custody expert documents the breakdown of procedure in Maricopa County on Election Day
https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1605680367679045633
Covid-1984
@Spiro_Ghost
Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer Testified Under Oath
That He Did Not Create A PAC That Opposed
@KariLake
There Are Screenshots of Now Deleted Tweets of Richer Announcing The PAC
Plus News Articles Reporting Richer’s PAC
Looks Like Richer May Have Perjured Himself👇
https://twitter.com/Spiro_Ghost/status/1605664186591240195
Kari Lake War Room
@KariLakeWarRoom
·
25m
Maricopa County Attorney accidentally brings signature verification into the equation.
If the court would like to talk about signature verification, we can do that all week.
Anthony DeWitt
@AnthonyDeWitt7
Kari Lake lawyers, “your Honor, you didn’t allow us to go down that road with questioning relating to the witnesses and that’s what {Maricopa County Lawyers} are doing, if you want us to go down that road, I’m happy to drive a truck through it”
🔥🔥🔥
Kari Lake War Room
@KariLakeWarRoom
·
24m
Maricopa County attorney now brings up 2,000 mules and ballot harvesting despite it never being alleged by the plaintiff.
Why are they trying to debunk claims we’ve never alleged?
Let’s get back to that nonexistent chain of custody, guys.
https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom