Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DrDude

The Case To Watch...

The US SC wants the BRUNSON V. ADAMS case.

Congress is ready to go into a Lame Duck condition. This can be a dangerous time with Democrats circulating a wish list to impose term limits on justices and pack the Court with leftists.

The SC may be inclined to EXPEDITE the Brunson Case, in order to be prepared to defend the Constitutional composition of the court.

Should Congress vote to jam a Constitutional issue of this magnitude through, in favor of Democrats, the Justices can come down against Congress.

After all, the Defendants in the Brunson Case are over 350 representatives and senators, and Resident Biden, VP Harris and certainly VP Mike Pence, for defying their Oath of Office to defend the Constitution against ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN and DOMESTIC.

Allowing no consideration for any investigation in the face of citizen affidavits of wrong doing, including denying Ted Cruz’s formal senate appeal for a Ten Day delay in order to present compelling findings, by Ted Cruz.

These individuals preferred to Certify a suspicious presidential election over the rights of the people to object for Cause.


462 posted on 11/30/2022 1:32:29 PM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Publik Skules/Academia = The Farm Team for more Marxists coming. Infinitum. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK

Rita, as I read it, the case is about the members who declined to execute their constitutional duties to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. It is a tort. The redress asked to repair the damages is that all of the culpable be unseated and new elections held.

So it is not per se about election fraud but rather dereliction of their highest sworn duty. Fraud is a background issue because the plaintiffs seek to show they had probably cause to stop proceeding and investigate yet did not.

Lawyers on the thread, please correct my understanding if I err.


463 posted on 11/30/2022 1:41:52 PM PST by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK

The potential here is that one branch of government takes down the other two, so the crime syndicate needs to pack the court quickly or face extermination.


474 posted on 11/30/2022 2:54:26 PM PST by Keflavik76 (Don't want to be a brick in Babylons wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK; Gulf War One; Keflavik76

David Nino Rodriguez interviews LOY BRUNSON, one of the brothers that brought forward the case to SCOTUS
https://rumble.com/v1xjjks-juan-o-savin-with-david-nino-rodriguez.html
excellent discussion
skip by participants that offend sensibilities
this could flip everything


536 posted on 11/30/2022 6:59:59 PM PST by smileyface ("The illuminati's whole philosophy demands the use, abuse, sacrifice and consumption of children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies ]

To: RitaOK
The Case To Watch...Jan 6 2023 for a conference (Term used similar to a hearing)
The US SC wants the BRUNSON V. ADAMS case.
The primary issue of the case is there was no investigation by legislators which was required.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html
The Brunson brothers web site:
https://7discoveries.com/
641 posted on 12/01/2022 4:11:24 AM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson