lj: ...This is one reason I don’t trust Derek Johnson hugely: “Also talks about the corporation vs. republic”
This has been dissected and debunked quite thoroughly.
```````
sf: sauce please
```````
lj: “Discussed long ago on Q threads.”
```````
sf: No. Not to my recollection.
***
You don’t get to dismiss things out of hand without question. Even if you are ‘well read’. Or it discussed loooong ago. Or from your “trusted telegram accounts”. The 19th president has been postulated by many good, military oriented decoders, including Derek Johnson, who you originally poo pooed in this exchange.
I asked for sauce. Per ransomnote, “I believe all those reading this post, who are serious and sincere on our Q threads, will identify their content as unsourced, provide sources, or politely supply missing sources when it’s pointed out (mistakes happen). I caution all who read our threads, you may want to consider unsourced material as rumors, or even ‘set ups’.” https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4109469/posts?page=522#522
Are you WWG1WGA? Or do you have another purpose?
I don’t have time to go back through dozens of threads.
trolls get hammered for not looking at the content of the first page in these threads.
the info is there but sometimes it requires a dig to get at it.
I’ll give you a start - discussed in the thread below - is it the “exact” thread ? I don’t know. where else ? you’ll have to dig:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3927118/posts
RN has a list of all the q threads on her hompage. there are a spitload. we can’t be expected to remember a specific thread even though we even might have been part of the discussion.
You had a few posts on that thread, but none directed at the corp. vs republic discussion
I looked at some recent MSM news about Corporation vs Republic.
Noted the date.
Then went to the Q thread closest to the date and got lucky.
Now to make searching stuff on FR easier, I use a couple of extensions created here:
http://cynwoody.appspot.com/fr_tree_viewer.html
Aftr I run the viewer extension, I then use browser search for a keyword- in this case “corporation”
I’m retired and I have the luxury of time to go thru all this.
Some are still working and don’t have the same luxury...I get it.
hope it helps...
FreeRegards.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/20/2022 Vol.435, Q Day 1849, smileyface wrote: lj: ...This is one reason I don’t trust Derek Johnson hugely: “Also talks about the corporation vs. republic”
This has been dissected and debunked quite thoroughly.
```````
sf: sauce please
```````
lj: “Discussed long ago on Q threads.”
```````
sf: No. Not to my recollection.
***
You don’t get to dismiss things out of hand without question. Even if you are ‘well read’. Or it discussed loooong ago. Or from your “trusted telegram accounts”. The 19th president has been postulated by many good, military oriented decoders, including Derek Johnson, who you originally poo pooed in this exchange.I asked for sauce. Per ransomnote, “I believe all those reading this post, who are serious and sincere on our Q threads, will identify their content as unsourced, provide sources, or politely supply missing sources when it’s pointed out (mistakes happen). I caution all who read our threads, you may want to consider unsourced material as rumors, or even ‘set ups’.” https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4109469/posts?page=522#522
Are you WWG1WGA? Or do you have another purpose?
I identify the following as unsourced because I'm WAAAAYYY too lazy right now to go back through prior threads or find my web sources. Maybe after Thanks Giving I can rev up the office chair and zoom around the Internet, but not tonight.
My unsourced recollection is the Corporation Vs. Republic is bad news. For example, an FBI informant was tasked with infiltrating a patriot group and part of his assignment was to get them to adopt 'Sovereign citizenship.' For some reason, either the FBI/CIA just finds that one useful, or they created it. It's useful in that it suggests indirect/direct insurrection at its heart ("You're not the boss of me!", "You can't make me pay taxes" etc.) and that makes it a powerful tool for framing patriots with destructive intent.
His embrace of Sovereign Citizenship is a problem with Derek Johnson - a red flag. The thing is, no one would follow disinformationists if all they had was bad information. So, those who mislead are given good, provable information to hook people and then salt their content with bad information, or when the time comes (crunch point) stand up and yell "We've all been deceived! THERE IS NO Q!" etc. The public understandably seizes on good information but can't tell, sometimes, what is black hat psyop and what is real.
Sometimes those spreading bad info are exposed or criticized for serving black hat purposes. It causes a divide in the readers (another win for black hats) who debate the source's patriotism, and the person in question dives deep into 'just the facts' patriotic content and the longer they do so, former readers return and tamp down their doubts because, "Look at all he/she posted that's good!" I don't know if Derek Johnson is following a faulty source re Sovereign Citizenship or is himself what I call an 'embed' (someone who blends into MAGA, contributes well and then contributes poison intentionally - rinse and repeat).
Well meant defenders provide as proof content a source provided which turns out to be real, but that isn't proof that anything else they say is real. A source you trust may have trusted someone you don't, but there's often no way to know who/what informed their decisions. We sometimes follow people who turn out to be lemons - it happens. So it's necessary to remain equally skeptical or neutral to what sources say until you lay hands on adequate data or documentation etc.
You could say Q is a source, because in 4963 Q drops, they never said anything about, or supported, Sovereign Citizenship, or any aspect of it. Q never asked us to dig on it, nor implied that it was the path to freedom. Q did say to avoid distractions. FOCUS. So it can be said that Sovereign citizenship is not Q content. Therefore, the question of "Are you WWG1WGA? Or do you have another purpose?" could boomerang back on you here.
Sovereign Citizenship is not Q content and not welcome on the Q threads, including Festival because if/when statements are made to the public, we don't need to be falsely portrayed as insurrectionists, nor does FR need it.