Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.

It just doesn’t sound like this could pass constitutional muster.


947 posted on 11/09/2022 12:15:15 PM PST by Keflavik76 (Don't want to be a brick in Babylons wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 941 | View Replies ]


To: Keflavik76

It’s intended to be a convoluted mess with the intent of diluting one man one vote and Republican conservative voting. Alaska is the only ‘conservative’ state that has it, thank you Murk. Maine does also. There are many cities, municipalities in liberal states that use it. Maybe someone in Alaska could challenge the constitutionality of RCV? IMO allowing RCV is one step closer to a democracy not a Republic and that is the intent of those that support the implementation of ranked choice voting.


951 posted on 11/09/2022 12:25:02 PM PST by Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn. (All along the watchtower fortune favors the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 947 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson