Replies

A couple of things we should learn buried in there.

When things aren't working as expected with a new disease, Physicians should not have to put their license or careers on the line to violate established protocols and try something different. Both the national institutions and provider organizations such as hospitals and clinics should loosen the reigns in that scenario. I remember some doctors in New York that really put their necks out when it came to changing protocols for patients needing ventilation.
When a better treatment protocol has been found, there needs to be quicker confirmation and information dissemination to other providers.
We need to protect nursing homes from sending contagious diseases back to them.
In face of the official "do nothing prior to hospitalization" several organizations such as front line doctors came up with pre-hospitalization therapeutics. Failure by the national institutes to consider these protocols was criminally negligent. They failed the first law of robotics: "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."

When a better treatment protocol has been found, there needs to be quicker confirmation and information dissemination to other providers.

I posted this back in August:

As far back as April, 2020, Dr. Roger Seheult of Medcram.com began to suspect that COVID-19 was "not a virus which effects the lungs, but does effect the lungs as a way of entry but it seems to do its most damage in the endothelium of the body."
See Coronavirus Pandemic Update 62: Treatment with Famotidine (Pepcid)? and Coronavirus Pandemic Update 63: Is COVID-19 a Disease of the Endothelium (Blood Vessels and Clots)?
According to Seheult, the problem with COVID-19 treatments were that they were trying to treat a lung disease instead of a blood disease. The mRNA "vaccine" tried to trick the body into thinking the virus was there so it would create antibodies to attack the virus.
The treatments suggested by Vladimir Zelenko (and supported by pre-COVID-19 studies discussed by Dr. Seheult) showed that a zinc-HCQ/Quercetin regimen was more effective; they didn't try to create antibodies, they assumed the virus would infect so they focused on stopping the replication of the virus in the blood cells.
Coupled with a NAC treatment to keep oxidative stress down, this blood cell therapy was likely to be a much more effective treatment than trying to attack the COVID-19 virus directly.

In my opinion, there were to many vested interests in the power of the lock-downs to want to change anything. The Trump administration and the Pence Task Force were already moving forward with using the Defense Production Act to secure more ventilators, to secure more N95 masks, and to triage emergency room capacity to focus on anything else.

Trump's best friend Stanley Chera died from COVID in mid-April 2020, so it became personal to him.

If they focused on why the elderly were so much more susceptible to the virus, they might have clued into the glutathione deficiency root-cause sooner.

-PJ