Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

If all of the leftists would just leave, we'll be fine.
1 posted on 11/03/2022 8:33:27 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

[[(only 8.23 years left)]]

Someone had better inform God of that because according to His word, there is at the very least, a guaranteed 1007 more years left- and likely many more years than that-


2 posted on 11/03/2022 8:39:03 PM PDT by Bob434 (question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Nonsense.


3 posted on 11/03/2022 8:40:33 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
... on excess greenhouse gas emissions – ...

False.

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide - Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? By Timothy Ball

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.

Sky-high hole blown in AGW theory?

"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"

That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.

The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'

Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.

Those four articles each show that Greenhouse Theory itself has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

That article kills any thought of planetary warming from any cause apart from the inter-glacial period we are in. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign of an acceleration of sea level rise how could the planet be warming? The rise in sea level in the last 100 years is far less than the average over the last 18,000 years caused by the inter-glacial period we are in.

4 posted on 11/03/2022 8:42:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (The Democrat Party is criminal, unAmerican and illegitimate )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Oaky, everybody deindustrialize immediately.


7 posted on 11/03/2022 8:48:02 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

But we killed all the cute little animals and pretty trees so the total biomass has evened out.


8 posted on 11/03/2022 8:51:09 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (This is not a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Well if sudden and unexplained deaths continue along the current curves some of us might be ok for a longer period, and the earth will survive


10 posted on 11/03/2022 8:51:25 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Climate change be damned, we do have too many people on the ball. Specifically, too many people procreating into poverty and squalor like rabbits.

A useless life is no life at all. People around the globe could stand to curb their enthusiasm.

I worked in West Africa where people would have swarms of children living in poverty. They didn’t even name them until they reached around 10 because the mortality rate is so high. Why did they have all these children? A retirement policy. A hope that one of the huge number of children would be successful enough to care for the parents in their old age.

That kind of population needs to be controlled. We can do without it. Another pitiful starving child is not only dumb, it is cruel.


13 posted on 11/03/2022 8:52:53 PM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Simple:

The elitists think they can hide their racism behind a fraudulent "man-made climate change" scheme, with the intent of killing off half of the population.

Fuel shortages, food shortages, restricted medical care, doctor assisted suicide, abortion on demand, destroy the family, mutilate and molest your children, no borders, empty prisons, streets flooded with deadly drugs, silence religious expression, destroy our freedoms and our Constitutional Republic,..... (what'd'I miss?)

15 posted on 11/03/2022 8:54:10 PM PDT by G Larry ( When Leftists say "Population Control" it means Killing Billions, not "limiting growth".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

If you believe there are too many people on the Earth you owe it to your convictions to kill yourself.

It’s the single most easiest way to do something about overpopulation.


16 posted on 11/03/2022 8:58:05 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The more illegal aliens in the United States the less we have to go around and the more they mess up our environment.


20 posted on 11/03/2022 9:07:45 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“Anthropocene” doesn’t exist but the delusional children of ‘The Conversation” will believe in anything.


21 posted on 11/03/2022 9:08:09 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson