[Boogieman]

“her husband, who “had for all intents and purposes unilaterally called a halt to their sexual relationship,” since Prince Harry’s birth in 1984.”

Ah. Maybe Charles noticed Harry was a ginger, and that gene wasn’t present in either of the ostensible parents’ family gene pools?

Yes, Charles was an adulterer, but adulterous men can still be picky about getting cuckolded.

[Nifster]

True that

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

Not so.

Diana’s brother Charles Spencer gave a tour of the family’s ancestral home at Althrop to a television audience a number of years ago.

There were many paintings on the walls that showed Harry’s male ancestors, many of whom had red hair.

[Albion Wilde]

Maybe Charles noticed Harry was a ginger, and that gene wasn’t present in either of the ostensible parents’ family gene pools?

All of Diana's siblings had red hair as children. Don't be a common gossip. Surely the Royals had the children's DNA tested decades ago, with so much at stake.

[Verginius Rufus]

Diana was descended from one of King Charles II's illegitimate children. But back in that period it seems to have been taken for granted that kings and princes would have mistresses. Charles II was just a bit more enthusiastic than most in carrying on that tradition.

When I visited Lincoln's home in Springfield, Illinois, I was told a story that a neighbor once witnessed Lincoln running from his house, being chased by his wife who was wielding a butcher knife.

[Churchillspirit]

"...that gene wasn't present in either of the ostensible parents' family gene pools?"

Wrong....Diana's family, especially her sisters were redheads.

Diana did not meet Hewitt until after Harry was born.