I never hear of W.H. Grampa before, but he sent kinda
intriguing tweets about the Midterms yesterday (link in
comments) (media.greatawakening.win) 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
I never hear of W.H. Grampa before, but he sent kinda
intriguing tweets about the Midterms yesterday (link in
comments) (media.greatawakening.win) 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
BLUEPRINT 🇺🇲
@BLUEPRINT_Q
·
5h
Only when evil is forced into the light can we defeat it.
Only when they can no longer operate in the [shadows] can people see the TRUTH for themselves.
Only when people see the TRUTH [for themselves] will people understand the true nature of their deception.
Difficult truths.
Q
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 10/26/2022 Vol.430, Q Day 1823, Ymani Cricket wrote: Found on GAW. For perusal, etc. I never hear of W.H. Grampa before, but he sent kinda
intriguing tweets about the Midterms yesterday (link in
comments) (media.greatawakening.win) 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
So if you were trying to provoke an angry response certain to get a response from MAGA, what would you do?
Here's my first try at a theory:
MAGA has already been slandered and threatened. More of the same doesn't seem like it would provoke a reaction that they could spin enough to beg for the UN troops to 'help'. (UN troops already in the US)
I think this points to Trump. They hope to try to escalate, move to the next level, so I think they'll want to put on a show of trying to humiliate him to get to us (provoke us). They want us to stare in disbelief, roar the word "NO!", throw down whatever cell phone, books, laundry we were carrying and snarl, "Okay, NOW you've done it! To get to him, you have to go through me! (us)."
We would do more before the public eye out of righteous anger to protect Trump than we would in response to more of the same continuous droning slander and threats against us as individuals, conservatives, MAGAs, Christians, or those who support the Q movement.
Some threat that addresses core assets not previously attacked in this manner, ever, would serve their purposes. If it is Nancy and Chuck supposedly holding a conference, it could mean Jan 6 hearing decisions, and their delivery finessed to maximize outrage while they would feign innocent confusion as to why MAGA reacted so strongly, with talking heads saying MAGA is a cult and intoning 'I guess the truth hurts' and worrying aloud that we'll become psychotic etc.
The provocteurs would likely want to present something easily and obviously disprovable in order to get as many MAGA yelling about it as possible, so they can point cameras at MAGA and say that we are coordinating rage and require a coordinated, military response to protect the rest of the nation from us. They'd want high participation levels. They don't actually have to have the capacity or will to ever carry through on threats against POTUS; they just have to make it seem like GITMO or orange jumpsuit has already happened or is inevitable within a day or so. The MSM can leak grainy green screen distant footage of a limo or paddy wagon; after all, they faked an inauguration and the White House Oval Office, and a false presidency.
They NEED to capture video proof to support the lies they've told about MAGA being violent and thisclose to insurrection, so they need us in the streets or outside the capitol to get us 'in frame' so the FBI and MSM can get their footage and set us up. With fake 'proof' then they can roll out the National Guard or their armed 'Homeland Security' (armed IRS?) or call for the United Nations to activate 'peacekeepers.'
Much of MAGA doesn't know the military is in control and that Trump is guarded by more than just Secret Service. This provocation could be extremely believable and likely tempt MOST people to angry demonstrations or protests.
If this kind of provocation actually happens, we can choose to refuse to comply with all expectations, stop society from functioning normally by withdrawing and fail to comply to the point they have no one to `rule over' (Ghandi).
They can activate UN troops or foreign troops etc. to frame protesters and foment riots, however, they don't have what it takes to make us all acknowledge the government as legitimate and go about our daily lives as usual. As your recent well-timed post of the French video clip showed, we would need to become 'ungovernable'.
I’m a little confused here.
when WHGrampa refers to “next week” is he talking about starting now? this week or next week referring to election week?
since trump hasn’t showed up for J6, I’d be surprised if they indicted him before the election??