To what purpose? To convince even more people that their country has been overthrown? ...that equal justice no longer exists?
***His purpose was not really to “get” these lowlevels, but to prove, in court, that the higher ups ordered the whole thing***
To what purpose? To convince even more people that their country has been overthrown? ...that equal justice no longer exists?
_____________________________________________________
Bob! You’ve gone over to the dark side. Please come back! Durham is only one piece in a very big chess game. The reclamation of the Republic was never going to hinge on just one move or one piece.
“To what purpose? To convince even more people that their country has been overthrown? ...that equal justice no longer exists?”
That is the hopeful interpretation if it is meant to set up a military coup to rectify things.
Read the articles and see what you think.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1580662628434661376.html
Here's a long clip,the piece is long but more than worthwhile:
I have proof that Dr. Fauci:
COVERED UP the BIGGEST MEDICAL MISTAKE IN HISTORY. The COVID antibody has no path into the lung. When I disocovered this, I let Dr. Fauci know. I did run it by my mentor, the Director of Ophtho at Johns Hopkins.
1.2 I couldn't believe the size of the mistake either and I mulled over it and talked to a lot of people. No one had an answer. Isn't it ridiculous? The COVID antibody never enters the lung. Wasn't that the whole point of the vaccine? To help the LUNG in an infection?
1.3 But, finally I wrote the page or two letter, and sent it to Dr. Fauci and several other directors and certified letters to every member in CONGRESS. When I had previously discussed it with my mentor, he listened quietly, and then told me I would be going to Stockholm.
1.4 I really thought that would end the COVID vaccine. This was about two years ago, so before the vaccine approval. But, no. I received a reply from Dr. Emily Erbelding, who thanked for sending the letter to the several directors, including Dr. Fauci.
1.5 But, a few weeks later, when Dr. Erbelding replied, what she generally seemed to say in her email was, well, sorry but our clinical results are awesome and here's a 1985? paper that will give you more info.
1.6 I was shocked. Didn't I just tell them that the COVID antibody will never go into the lung? I told my mentor and showed him the email. He was very disappointed and sad that they couldn't keep an open mind. He said, all they had to do was throw a couple million $ into it
1.7 So, being me. And wordy. But precise and detail oriented. I wrote back a 73 page letter to Dr. Fauci. Explaining every aspect of this huge mistake. No reply. Of course, I sent him email after email. and even Dr. Francis Collins who happens to be the NIH director.
1.8 And Dr. Collins happened to be my genetic professor in medical school (U of M, ann arbor, go blue). No reply. Couldn't believe it. Just couldn't. By this time, I knew there was something horribly bad going down.
1.9 I then tried to contact the CDC. I must have emailed at least a couple dozen directors over and over. And I must have called at least half a dozen times. The massive mistake is simple, isn't it? The COVID antibody will never enter the lung.
2.0 The CDC directors, very curt and short and rude to me. Of course, not when I first call. I'm a lasik surgeon trying to give them some important info... and then, easy to explain to CDC M.D.s Blood lung barrier? can stop water? antibodies are huge??
2.1 And then, invariably, their rush to get off the phone, often just click. The coldest shoulders, I got from them. Now, I knew aargh. My highly educated double fellowshipped MIT friend kept telling me, you'll never stop it.
2.2 This timeline isn't expanded. I did tons in between every tweet. But, I'm going to fast forward now.
I send ALL my info to Pfizer. 73 pages, 12 pages , 3 pages.(Indicates Pfizer knew what they were doing all along) All the stuff I've been writing. I even explain that the PREP act gives them legal immunity, UNLESS...
2.3 Pfizer, UNLESS you're involved in WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. How will you explain to mothers later? whose children had severe side effects? Dr. Lee INFORMED you of your HORRIBLE MISTAKE? and you continued to sell your vaccine??
2.4 Pfizer, CEO and directors, do you ALL want to ruin a huge company? For ONE vaccine? Why don't you just do the right thing?
2.5 Fast forward again. about a week ago, I called Moderna and taped a 25 minute conversation. Explaining all this. That their antibody has no path into the lung, that we had another way of healing, ribonucleases, that there are a lot of questions.
2.6 I told Moderna I would release the tape on twitter. Fast forward. A couple of days ago, big news breaks and its huge on twitter, Pfizer admits did not test for viral transmission.(gotta wonder if this guy is responsible for Pfizer fessing up)
2.7 Now, current. The day I'm writing these tweets. This is for teaching purposes, purely speculation about different actions organizations or companies can take, from very ethical, to very unethical. It's hard to know the truth. so, we have to examine every possibility.
2.8 Speculation. Now, If I'm Moderna and they thought their vaccine saved the world, and this lasik doc calls up and tells them about this ridiculously HUGE mistake, write under their NOSE, and SO simple EVERYONE can see it, they should have panicked. And then, say.
2.9 Speculation. Moderna still. They should have said, this guy probably talked to PFizer too. More lawyers, more experienced lawyers. Moderna thinks, we need to talk to them. We might be on the same side.... as Pfizer
3.0 Again. Speculation. But that's what detectives do, play out different scenarios to find the bad guy, if there IS one. So, don't SUE me for clearly labelling this SPECULATION. That's to YOU BIG PHARMA.
3.1 Speculation. Now, Pfizer. What a bad version of Pfizer might have done. If Moderna calls them again, this is a scenario. And Moderna says, hey did this lasik doc talk to you guys too? What's your plan? Is this a real issue? Our antibody doesn't go into the lung?
3.2 Speculation again. Pfizer now KNOWS this news will break once the audiotape of the lasik doc and Moderna conversation comes out. They need to get ahead of it. So, they KNOW they have to have LEGAL immunity. And KNOWING that they did something willful is the problem.
3.3 Speculation STILL. If a bad version of Pfizer only wants to protect themselves, cuz for a year they have known about this HUGE mistake (that's when the lasik doc told them) and now there is legal liability.
3.4 Speculation, so, Then IF Pfizer comes out with this "never tested for viral transmission" which went huge on twitter, then they can say, we didn't EVER plan to have no viral tranmission, so when this lasik doc says we are involved in willful misconduct.... (continued) 3.4 Speculation still. if that doc says we were involved in bad deeds, we can say, we NEVER said the antibody was in the lung. Or another way of saying that which they did say, we DID NOT TEST FOR VIRAL TRANSMISSION. So, now even if the Lasik DOC says, you're doing something bad.....
continues....