Criticism of the author is only valid if the source material, Putin’s own words, were changed.
That Putin is against Soros & Co. doesn’t make him good. They’ve both bad. Putin sees the Soros gang as competition for his own desires of domination.
RE: Criticism of the author is only valid if the source material, Putin’s own words, were changed.
I got attacked personally in this thread for posting an article writen by Fiona Hill, who many consider a “George Soros Mole”.
But what I’d really like to see is a refutation of the POINTS made in this article.