“””You guys need to make up your minds. If Trump wrapping himself in the flag of Q makes him a “madman” and “unhinged” and “unfit” as your friend and fellow Q follower claims, why are you insisting he is doing just that? Don’t you want him to win?”””
TWW’s friend didn’t say that, he said this:
“Did you notice he didn’t attempt to explain away Trump’s other 70 or 80 “retruths” the MSM is talking about all in a flitter? Maybe you, Chase and gummer can get together and convince yourselves that Trump didn’t wrap the mantle of Q around himself. Your concern is notable. He’s a madman! How will you ever vote for the man of Qtards? It’s just embarrassing. For you.”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4092265/posts?page=462#462
Looks like TWW’s friend was sarcastically mocking “your”, “you” and the other two bumpkins. Why would you mis-characterize what another poster said?
Oh, it was probably just a “comprehension” problem on your part. /S
Still leaves you anti-Q people in a bind on how to justify your vote for a man embracing the Q movement, even if he’s just trolling the FAKE news media, including LGBTQLMNOP The Daily Dot, or rousing part of his base. :)
You’ll have to be even more “creative” with your “mis-characterizations”. Try harder.
PS: Q is not looking for followers, but freethinkers who think for themselves, who even question what Q says. But you’ll never understand that following The Daily Dot, or the Stars. And you won’t understand that either.
https://www.qanon.pub/?q=be%20careful
****
In your #462 you wrote: “Trump himself invited this smear. He’s unhinged. You’re making a good argument for him to not be representing the RNC or runnning for POTUS in ‘24.”
****
Again, I never said Trump invited the smear. I said the opposite. I certainly never said he is unhinged. You guys are the ones claiming he purposefully invited it by retruthing Q stuff and playing Q music. So who are the ones making the argument again? You guys are.
Why do you mischaracterize what other posters write?
You guys are the ones defending “fake news” Associated Press, not I.
Don’t like the Daily Dot? Here’s video of Q followers complaining about Q gear being banned at a Trump rally after not being allowed in, starting at around the 18 minute mark:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_-y-BIAtS0
Yeah, it’s lefty Vice, so you’ll probably say it’s “fake news” and they’re actors or something. Yet you defend the “fake news” AP article because it suits you. Go figure.
Still, I ask again, if Trump is embracing Q as you claim he is, why does he ban Q gear at his rallies? Why are people wearing Q gear turned away? Why is Q merch outlawed at his rallies?
You seem to be aware that those who are not Q followers and know what Q is* would have trouble voting for Trump if he “embraced” Q. The vast majority of conservatives and Republicans are not into Q. So why would Trump “embrace” Q or pander to Q followers? It’s not in his interest. He knows that — hence his prohibition of Q gear at his rallies.
Pandering to Q followers does not render him any benefit, as Q followers will remain convinced he is Q+ no matter what and remain fired up to vote for him no matter what. Embracing Q would fire up the Dem base and sap Republican voter enthusiasm. No positives, too many negatives.
And sorry, can’t resist. Richard Feelgood?!? You can’t make this stuff up. On the other hand, it’s just the sort of moniker one would expect to find in the cesspool of 8kun.
Every time I see WWG1WGA, I can’t help thinking of this:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tDQw21ntR64
* Many have never heard of Q, but the Dems and MSM are working hard to change that. NBC has been really busy lately:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AREEFhhoqmg&t=40s
They’re also trying to convince people that Q followers are “dangerous”. Well, you seem pretty harmless to me, doing your numerology stuff, sitting at your keyboards deciphering Q drops and whatnot. Certainly way less dangerous to the general public than antifa or BLM for sure.