I’m sure that I’m not alone is processing information superficially. How many have seen a headline and moved on without reading the article from beginning to end? It’s O.K. if the headline is simply factual, that so and so died today. But many headlines are written to push an agenda. When that happens, we should probably make a decision. Either ignore the headline, or read the article from beginning to end, perhaps pausing along the way to exercise critical judgment.
Here’s some text from the posted article that is really a jumble. How much is from Flynn, some other source, or from the author?
Flynn pointed to “crazy ideas” associated with the QAnon movement — usually labeled by the mainstream media as a “baseless conspiracy theory” — such as the notion that, during his presidency, Trump was “battling an entrenched bureaucracy and sex trafficking ring run by pedophiles” and currently, that Trump is still the acting, sitting President.
Is “baseless conspiracy theory” a quote from Gen Flynn, the mainstream media, or people in general? It sounds like General Flynn is saying that Trump was NOT battling an entrenched bureaucracy. Is that what he said? Who put Flynn in jail, if not an entrenched bureaucracy? Who mentioned the idea that some people think Trump is still the acting, sitting President? It’s not in quotes. Was that final example gratuitously thrown in by the author?
It’s all a mess and not to be taken seriously. It provides entertainment value but is otherwise a waste of time.
The article isn’t clear as you say. It looks to me that Flynn called Q claims “crazy”, but then used as an example of “crazy” the claim that Trump battled the deep state while in office - a now-proven fact. If so, then “crazy”, as used by Flynn, clearly doesn’t mean “untrue”. The truth is that we are living in observably-crazy, crazy times. The story here is what he DOESN’T say. Flynn never says that any of the “crazy” claims are untrue,
He said that government uses information, disinformation, and psyops, and that he believes Q started as a government effort (during Trump’s Presidency) and then moved to a non-governmental group. Which exactly aligns with what Q has said about itself - 10 or so people, most military, engaging in information warfare including psyops and disinformation as well as information in the form of clues to provide deniability for the disclosers.
Q has made it clear that they are a psy-op to encourage people to remain focused and united, to engage in the battle, and to trust/believe that their efforts at the personal and local levels are not only necessary but also not in vain because there are ALSO other hidden plans going on that will change the hopelessness of so much corruption (the same hopelessness often expressed by anti-Q posters here).
And once again, regarding that hidden “plan”, the story is what Flynn DOESN’T say: Flynn says “This idea that there’s some ‘plan,’ or something that’s going to happen…” but then doesn’t ever say that isn’t true. He instead goes on to mention that the “plan” is to ENCOURAGE personal, local involvement - which is what Q’s hidden “plan” is all about: overcoming the hopelessness and resulting apathy/non-involvement.
In short, Flynn believes Q is what it claims to be, approves of Q’s stated objectives, and didn’t call any of the “crazy” Q claims inaccurate.