MAGA BILL CLINTON
https://www.bitchute.com/video/x1zZ7fQbS9jB/
The only group prior to the Sozi where the Freikorps.
Do not slander me by calling me vile names
Posted on 09/10/2022 4:28:13 AM PDT by MNDude
And for those of you who think Ron Watkins is the mastermind behind Q, watch his performance in this debate during his congressional run for the District 2 Arizona seat:
Arizona Horizon election debates 2022: Republican candidates for Congressional District 2
19,033 views Streamed live on Apr 27, 2022 Arizona PBS
https://youtu.be/YMyokbqvNvU
Oh Noes!
Not THE LIST!
So.. you like went and counted?
Just wow. You need some kind of help. Or an institution.
Or better drugs.. maybe different drugs or fewer drugs, I can't say.
It's clear you're some kind of nut and I hope you're not a danger to
the people around you or to yourself. Or to the Qtards, bless 'em all.
As of 2019, 8kun reportedly finally banned child porn:
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/8chan-is-back-as-8kun/
Whereas Watkins tolerated it just fine before, yes when Q started dropping and continued to drop:
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/8chan-pedophiles-child-porn-gamergate/
I wonder what’s up with it now that 8kun has switched hosts again, though. A search on “8kun porn” turns up really nasty stuff, including bestiality. No, sorry, I’m not clicking on those. Do your own search and have a look.
Then there’s this:
*****
Cullen Hoback’s six-part docuseries features Jim Watkins, who has admitted to profiting off child porn web domains. But you wouldn’t know that from watching him on Into the Storm.
https://www.primetimer.com/item/Q-Into-The-Storm-goes-easy-on-a-guy-profiting-off-child-porn-RBS3ww
*****
And this from 2020:
*****
QAnon Is Supposed to Be All About Protecting Kids. Its Primary Enabler Appears to Have Hosted Child Porn Domains.
Archives document Jim Watkins’ links to domains suggestive of underage sexual material:
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/jim-watkins-child-pornography-domains/
*****
And this from this year:
*****
Entries in the archive, created between 2004 and 2018, show he was slow to address concerns about child pornography and sometimes dismissed advice from moderators seeking to stop the spread of potentially illegal content. They repeatedly record moderators of Watkins’ forum coming to him for advice on how to handle issues related to child sex abuse material and pedophilic content, and Watkins responding with blasé indifference.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/05/qanon-jim-watkins-pink-pedophilic-links/
*****
Looks like they switched hosting out of the US around October of 2020:
*******
The latest 8chan version was being kept online by one internet provider, Washington state-based VanwaTech. The connection between the forum and VanwaTech was first reported on Twitter by Fredrick Brennan, an American software developer who helped create 8chan but has since cut ties with it over its hate and violence and spends time tracking down sites that enable it.
[snip]
On Monday, it appeared that VanwaTech had found another protection service to replace CNServers, the Russia-based ddos-guard.net. 8kun now shares a server with the militant group Hamas and others who have been pushed off mainstream hosting sites.
[snip]
The founder of Spartan Host, which is based in Belfast, has repeatedly defended his decision to keep 8chan and affiliated sites online.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/oct/19/far-right-online-forum-8chan-loses-internet
******
Maybe 8kun has switched again.
The fact remains that Q was dropping on a 8chan, which later morphed into 8kun, while child porn was being peddled on that site, whether it is still to be found there or not. And Ron Watkins has a sordid history as a purveyor of it, plus other sick porn.
Yes, Mother Jones is commie, and I hate commie. But they do sometimes do some great investigative journalism, I must admit. A few years ago, they did a great piece on illegal immigrants working in meatpacking plants and the health risks involved, as well as violations of labor laws. And yes, The Guardian is leftie, but that does not mean they got basic facts wrong.
It’s a shame our own conservative media don’t cover this stuff. They don’t watchdog miscreants on the right as they as they should. It would reflect better on us if they did.
No thanks.
I'd be scared to be on your dread list of bad actors.
I’m a little late coming in but, this statement by (You) cannot be allowed to stand:
“They have their very own Special Q Thread here where they are protected from challenge or criticism:”
This is a lie and CatHerd is a LIAR.
This reflects poorly on Jim Robinson and Free Republic.com
The First LIE: The Q Thread is not “special”. As it gets renewed it is posted on the main forum for all to see. Mods and JR could disallow it in a heart beat.
The Second LIE: The Q thread is NOT protected from challenge or criticism.
The Q thread welcomes all posters who criticize...rationally. “The Thread” defends ITSELF when challenged. Specifically, MODS tend to discipline OUR members who engage with others.
AAMOF, it is more restricted in its content than any other thread on the forum; 9-11 as an inside job can’t be posted. JFK dead by CIA is also not discussed.
So you see, CatHerd is a liar but...I’ll just point it out and hope that CatHerd will be more truthful in the future.
Why, CatHerd is even welcome on the Q Thread.
Right bagser?
Yeah, how did you get left off their commie-style List? Why were you not deserving of that honor?
Bloggers got boring and his b/f broke up with him, which makes him a bored Grumpygunner.
Just one nit to pick. I've discussed the CIA/Deep State killing JFK about a gazillion times. Since its the truth.
Why, CatHerd is even welcome on the Q Thread. Right bagser?
Oh, HELLZ no!
Put that devil behind me.
#SufferTrolls
: )
I did not lie at all. You know what they say about those who are quick to accuse others of lying.
Just because your Q threads are renewed and visible to all does not mean they are not special.
You guys whined about being mistreated on the main board and asked for your specially protected threads (similar to the religious denomination caucus threads which are protected from criticism by outsiders). You get those who show up there and post criticisms you don’t like reprimanded by Mods or even zotted. We’ve all seen it.
I don’t see how it reflects poorly on JimRob or FR at all. He graciously gave you a safe space where you could do your Q stuff in peace. My understanding is that, in return, you guys agreed to keep your Q conspiracy theories and proselytizing off the main board. Either I am mistaken, or you have not kept your end of the bargain. Since his illness and absence some of you have started bragging on the main board how you will drive off us stubborn “normies” and turn FR into a giant Special Q Thread.
If those things (JFK and 911 conspiracies) are not allowed on your Q threads, they are not allowed outside them, either. Why claim you are being specially persecuted by JimRob and the Mods?
Some Q thread regulars break FR rules on the main board with impunity. They refuse to stop posting to fellow Freepers who ask them to stop, and they engage in personal attacks, name calling, insults, false accusations, stalking, etc. And yet you claim the Mods are harder on you? Seriously, take a chill pill and stop maligning our very busy Mods. They deserve our gratitude and respect.
No thanks, I have no interest in posting on your Q threads. Not my cup of tea. But I wish you all a lovely day.
:: Either I am mistaken ::
No, you are not mistaken, you are a liar.
Shadilay, normie.
Trump was duped to use a ‘Q’ song in his ‘Nation in Decline’ campaign like message..
Wonder which deep state handler got Trump to do that..
Yahoo News apparently was alarmed, though..
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4085098/posts
Trump accused of using QAnon theme song in campaign video: ‘That’s not an accident’
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh, so you’re one of those Trump is stupid fool/puppet of the deep state, then.
All I know is what I have been told and seen posted here on FR about it —which may or may not have been correct. If that was not the agreement, why not simply say so and set the record straight?
Why scream liar at me? Why no facts and reasoned debate instead of name calling?
I hope you enjoy the rest of your day. Have a nice cold drink and chill. Q and Watkins aren’t worth losing your cool over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.