Bagster joined in on the thread soon after my post. It was glorious.
Later, Easy chimed in to get a few licks in. For all I know she may be defending all of we FreeQs right now.
Heck, you could go over to that thread and help her out if you like?

I added that General Flynn was correct. Q-Anon is a deep state construct. (Not in those words)
Q-anon was invented by the deep state to discredit Q.
My point was that it’s essentially a diversion. By appearances it seems to be a “usual suspects” group just getting crew to come over and divert to giving the same answers/info they’ve been given for years.
If they have a new angle, something to add, then maybe...
But the minute I see “QAnon” these days my DS BS detector starts chirping...
Kalam wrote:
“
Whew, where did that come from? Me thinks you didn’t quite grasp my intent.
Bagster joined in on the thread soon after my post. It was glorious.
Later, Easy chimed in to get a few licks in. For all I know she may be defending all of we FreeQs right now.
Heck, you could go over to that thread and help her out if you like?
“
Could you post a link to that thread?
“Later, Easy chimed in to get a few licks in. For all I know she may be defending all of we FreeQs right now.”
~~~~~~~
Why yes, yes I was. It’s what I do. ;-)
FYI, I’m a GrandFATHER pushing 70. (Not a she.)
This is the thread, for the curious.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4092265/posts
~Easy