Posted on 09/06/2022 5:01:12 PM PDT by ransomnote
OT but in the comment by “paddy” says that per a new law signed by hidenbiden, banks can seize account holders accounts to pay the banks liabilities (such as people not being able to pay the 0% loans):
I didn’t want to sign up to ask “paddy”, so was wondering what law number it was.
Many thankQs MqD!
Check the Post today; did they run the story mentioned in the link?
https://twitter.com/nathanwinsagain/status/1557200779869552640
nathanwinsagain
@nathanwinsagain
·
Aug 9
Replying to
@nathanwinsagain
and
@GeorgePapa19
The New York Post is set to confirm this tomorrow morning.
Despite my Pence skepticism, my response would be: "President Trump already has a VP -- who would be in office now if the 2020 election had been fairly adjudicated."
Make Awakenings Great Again!
My two children have recently taken issue with a major decision in my life, because of course it *might* have a negative effect on them down the road. Since they're both vaxxers and have complete disrespect for my beliefs about Trump, Q, and the "vaccines", I am letting them know that they do not have "standing" to interfere in my life.
subject to interlocutory
appeal, at least in the 11th Circuit. And when reviewed, it is only for abuse of discretion.”
“Some of the documents at the Kherson laboratory appear to be missing and may have been destroyed, Kirillov said, suggesting it was related to the 2018 outbreak of a mosquito-borne parasitic disease in that region, and a possible cover-up.”
~~~~~~~
Just a reminder that our informed consent for this horror wasn’t lost...
It never existed in the first place.
~Easy
Not true.
I’m with CJ on “Waterworld”. (And especially “The Postman.)
🐸
It means that in normal cases the appointment of a special master is something that is delegated to the judge and the court of appeals is not likely to intervene but rather give deference to the appointing judge ... Dhillon notes that in the 11th Circuit such an appointment is not even appealable and even/if so reviewed is only in cases where a judge abused discretion. In other words, in a normal sequence of events, there would be no predicate for 11th Circuit intervention and it’s curious Barr pushed this on D_o_J
the brainwashing of the mass populace is deep
I just posted this local gnuus re: Ukrainian immigrants BTT
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4092108/posts
Mark
“No one like Waterworld.”
I sure as h3ll did. Watched it multiple times as a matter of fact.
That’s reassuring, ThankQ! WWG1WGA :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.