Informed choice is a key variable in this whole discussion.
IMO, the pushers of this drug have deliberately done what they can to deny people sufficient information so that they can indeed make an informed choice.
The most egregious slight of hand has been to label an experimental drug as a vaccine. I won’t go into any other aspects of the policy of misrepresenting information or the heavy handed process of pushing the drug.
For my wife and I a top tier reason we avoided it is a simple, long standing policy we both have. No drugs that have not been in general use for 10 years after (proper) testing and approval. I have other objections but even if I had no other reasons, that is the deal breaker all by itself.
I have seen too many drugs over my lifetime that were supposed to be so great and after a few years were realized to be bad, or even horrible.
Informed choice requires that the average person is freely given access to the information required to make an informed decision. I don’t believe that has been the case with this drug. One should not have to be a research junkie to be an informed consumer.
Can you say Vioxx?
That is wisdom and a good argument to use when your doctor pushes you to get vaxxed.