Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
>>information sheet

It was the legally required Johnson & Johnson Label.

Why the push to shoot up the population for a virus with a 99.7% survivability rate?

192 posted on 09/04/2022 10:50:56 AM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: Deaf Smith

Deaf Smith wrote: “It was the legally required Johnson & Johnson Label.”

Your complaint was the mRNA vaccines. J&J isn’t mRNA which means your opposition is purely anti-vaccine, not mRNA.

Deaf Smith wrote: “Why the push to shoot up the population for a virus with a 99.7% survivability rate?”

Did you take the polio vaccines? Polio has essentially the same survivability rate. Do the math. Fatality rate is 0.0005 or a survivability rate of 0.9995 (One in 200 infections leads to irreversible paralysis. Among those paralysed, 5–10% die when their breathing muscles become immobilized.) BTW, approximately 70% of polio cases were asymptomatic.


194 posted on 09/04/2022 11:27:49 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson