Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
I am not a anti-vaxxer because the shots are not a “vaccine”.

The CDC went a far as changing the definition of a vaccine on it’s website to fit the narrative of their push to get people to take the shot.

I stand by the wording Experimental Gene Therapy that was presented as part of the Public Service Announcement made in 2021.

When this PSA came out, I down loaded the first five pages of the 157 page PDF Johnson $ Johnson Label of their “vaccine”.

That was enough for me to say; Nope, not taking it.

189 posted on 09/04/2022 10:14:58 AM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: Deaf Smith

Deaf Smith wrote: “I am not a anti-vaxxer because the shots are not a “vaccine”.”

Yes, anyone who subscribes to all the anti-vaxxer propaganda is an anti-vaxxer.

Deaf Smith wrote: “The CDC went a far as changing the definition of a vaccine on it’s website to fit the narrative of their push to get people to take the shot.”

CDC changed the definition because the previous definition could be interpreted to mean vaccines are 100% effective. This has never been the case for any vaccine.

Deaf Smith wrote: “I stand by the wording Experimental Gene Therapy that was presented as part of the Public Service Announcement made in 2021.”

You stand by a PSA that you can’t quote or link to?

Two points. First point. You don’t understand gene therapy.

Gene therapies involve making deliberate changes to a patient’s DNA in order to cure or alleviate a genetic condition. This can be by adding a functional copy of a gene, disabling a gene that makes a faulty product or changing gene activation.

The mRNA from the vaccines does not enter the cell nucleus or interact with the DNA at all, so it does not constitute gene therapy.

Gene therapies can have long-lasting effects because they permanently change the cell’s DNA, with these changes being inherited by any daughter cells that result if the cell divides. In contrast, mRNAs are always transitory and are not inherited by daughter cells, making them ideal for use in vaccines.

Second point. You make a big deal out of the J&J vaccine using their information sheet to justify avoiding mRNA vaccines. The J&J vaccines isn’t mRNA, it’s an old fashioned vaccine which, BTW, would fall under the previous defintion of a vaccine.


191 posted on 09/04/2022 10:38:29 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson