See this is the problem between reading and regurgitating like you do because you haven’t even the first idea on what question to ask
So you source a “medical group” who have performed post mortem examination and in one case ad quickly ad four hours! My gosh! Four hours!!!! The smoking gun!!!!
Oh wait. In four hours there is often post mortem lividly as blood pools and clots in dependent regions. Also at four hours probably rigor mortis will have set in which also would by the physics of it have blood clotted
And the simple truth is that even in a beating heart with Afib the non synchronized pulsatile flow in the LAA causes — wait for it — CLOT!
So someone is getting their fastest post they will find clot. What you have done is post evidence that sinks your argument instead of bolstering it. Because you simply don’t know what questions to ask or what facts to see not because Of malevolence I am sure but because it obviously isn’t your area of expertise.
So you are relegated to believing hook line and sinker what someone else writes. So instead of critical analysis it is simply repeat with a false sense of knowledge.
Forget it. There are people posting that by this point have a result in mind and work backwards from that. Any paper, any person that they believe validates their conclusion is welcomed.
My guess is that the same people who claim you post too much would be welcoming your posts with open arms if you supported their position.