But that’s not your argument. You say all communications companies (well, except for those under some arbitrary size limit and those that you say are a club, etc, etc.) should lose their ability to moderate the content on their sites.
Or are all communications companies government agents?
You are pulling a dishonest thing here. You keep using the word "moderate" which means a very different thing from censor.
What they are doing is censoring. They are not "moderating." They are banning opinions they don't like, and it has not a d@mn thing to do with "moderating" a website, it has only to do with suppressing ideas they don't like.
So how about you stop your dishonest word swapping?
And to answer your question, I am coming around to the belief that when you get to be a certain size, you automatically attract the notice of the government, (or governments) which then forces you to be a proxy.
Or are all communications companies government agents?
It's beginning to look that way.