A very important thing to remember is Noack did not examine any vaccine himself. He is going by the highly questionable (to put it kindly) “Spanish study” and at the time the video was made, apparently believed it was absolutely true.
Spanish study: Ricardo Delgado Martin, an anti-vax activist who runs a blog called
“La Quinta Columna” (Fifth Column), had Dr.Pablo Campra a professor at the University of Almería in Madrid, analyse what was purported to be a vial of vaccine. The vial was of unknown provenance and sent by Martin to Dr. Campra by messenger.
Experts consulted by Spanish fact-checker Maldita.es said here images could show any material.
In his study, Campra Madrid himself acknowledges that the “microscope doesn’t provide conclusive evidence” and that the analysis comes from “a single, limited sample” – one of unknown origin and traceability.
Now, back to Noack and his video. He says “Russian roulette” about the people who keel over right after getting the vaccine, and about athletes whose “blood moves faster through the body”. Later, he says that eventually the razor blades will cut up your blood vessels, heart, brain etc., little by little. At the 8:45 mark he says it “will kill the whole population of the country” when referring to the Austrian mandate.
He mentions several times that it is more dangerous if injected into an artery. Whether he means “only dangerous” is questionable, given other statements.
According to the blurb for the video: “He explains the graphene hydroxide is not biodegradable and will eventually kill all who has taken it.” Then adds: “After this video was released, Dr Noack was attacked and killed.” Which is not true — he died of a heart attack. So the blurb is suspect. This does not appear to be the entire video. Perhaps he clears up the question later in the part cut off?
Steve, I honestly can’t tell whether he means “Russian roulette” as to whether you get it in an artery or not, or whether you keel over sooner rather than later. As he says things that indicate the former, others the latter, I can’t be certain. It seems ambiguous to me. The translation seems fine to me (I speak German), so it’s not that.
Noack video: https://www.bitchute.com
Noack says he is a leading expert in activated carbon (aka activated charcoal). I’ve no doubt he knows lots about graphene, certainly more than I do.
Noack says that Dr. Campra’s images are not of graphene oxide, but graphene hydroxide. Dr. Campra said “look similar to images of graphene oxide” and “inconclusive”, while other experts said “inconclusive - could be anything” (Reuters) and “microscopy is not an adequate method to study the presence of graphene or graphene oxide” (AFP).
Among other arguments, Diasio said that liquids containing graphene or graphene oxide in any significant amount tend to be dark brown or black. If the shots had “even 1% graphene or graphene oxide” (the claim states it has 99.9%), the liquid would look black or at least, dark, Diasio said.”
[From Reuters article, link above]
Finally, we have this from AFP. At the end is a list of experts and quotes from them saying graphene oxide is still in the experimental stage when it comes to vaccines, and no vaccines containing graphene oxide are commercially available:
https://factcheck.afp.com/http%253A%252F%252Fdoc.afp.com%252F9FM82U-1
Yes, it’s globo-lefty Reuters and AFP leans lefty, but you can check their sources and links.
So, we have Noack going solely by Campra’s images of a liquid from a vial of unknown provenance, sent to him by an activist. Did Martin tamper with the vial? Where did he get it? We don’t know. Is he a trustworthy source? Well... I think Dr. Campra is an honest scientist. Martin, not so much. He’s flogging his blog and videos.
Noack makes the supposition there is graphene hydroxide in the vaccines, which has industrial applications but not used in medicine or in vaccines, based on Campra’s images.
Okay. given all the problems with “the Spanish study” why has no one else in the whole wide world done a proper analysis of vaccine from a vial of known provenance and found graphene of either persuasion?
Why would Pfizer and Moderna put graphene hydroxide in their vaccines? And unless you believe in a vast worldwide conspiracy involving those who secretly procure it (and sell it to them), secretly add it in at various production facilities worldwide, batch checkers, etc., how are they doing it abd getting away with it? All highly illegal, of course, too. All these evil, evil murderous people who want to kill everyone, including children. If someone wants to believe that, then ... that’s his or her prerogative.