Now that I’ve sacrificed and listened to the entire interview, my conclusion is that even though Ivan may have scored some points for accuracy on some details, his conclusion is way off base, for a number of reasons, most of which I posted already. His theory doesn’t even really have a final point, or conclusion of what Trump’s plan is, or what is next, other than get a good House and Senate and if states decertify something can happen.
He doesn’t address how voter fraud can get fixed, how the bad guys will face justice, Durham is DS, Trump is weak, clueless, and forced to do things, and said nothing that proved Devolution wrong. Ivan’s plan goes against Q messages. I think his ego got in front of him and dragged him around.
Thanks for saving me the time, lj
I think you’re right, LJ. From my observations, your instincts are very sound. And generally, when something feels wonky or “just doesn’t sit right”, it’s a good idea to trust one’s instincts.
Much admiration for having the stamina to make it through the whole interview. :-)