Posted on 08/31/2022 9:28:33 PM PDT by ransomnote
video
Kash Patel just retruthed a post from five months ago saying that Trump would act before 2024! đź‘€
So Trump just played the WWG1WA song, is calling for a new election and now this?
It’s literally happening Patriots!!
https://truthsocial.com/@beercan45/108014327993710091
3.2K
Glad you’re not going anywhere! The threads wouldn’t be the same without you. :-)
Best,
AFB-XYZ
Doocy: “You tweeted in 2016 that Trump stole an election.”
Jean-Pierre: “I knew this was coming.”
Doocy: “If denying election results is extreme now, why wasn’t it then?”
Jean-Pierre: “That comparison that you made is just ridiculous.”
@WokeSocieties 🇺🇸
7.6K
Kash believes we are on the verge of defeating the deep state:
“I think we’re on the verge of defeating them - [them] being the deep state and the fake news media, because so many people are turning off cable news because they can’t stand it anymore… but [their] clock, luckily, is running out, because once we hit November and the majorities flip… we must demand… that our Congress do the job they were put in DC to do.”
TICK TOCK đź’Ą
https://t.me/TheStormHasArrived17/10984
So glad you aren’t leaving! ***Sanity Lounge***. LOL! Isn’t that the truth?!
Please keep up the reminders for us to be ladies and gentlemen. I was raised the same way and I know better, but sometimes my temper gets the best of me. :(
RE:
“...then perhaps the incumbent president is not B, but is T or someone else!...”
The ruling by Judge Cannon consistently refers to “former President Donald J. Trump (“Plaintiff”)”,”the Court takes into account the undeniably unprecedented nature of the search of a former President’s residence” (identifying Donald J. Trump as owner of MAL), etc.
Also, “Incumbent president” is associated with “Government” without direct reference by name it is associated with the Department of Justice Lawyer presenting the case.
I don’t believe an argument of who is or is not the “Incumbent president” is a straw argument not worth pursuing in this context.
I still stand by my #1 (I believe Biden not only Knew, I believe he ordered the raid and coordinated it with Garland.), and respect your right to disagree with my OPINION.
WWG1WGA,
HLB
We tend to think of the presidential election as being held in November, but that’s the people choosing Presidential Electors. Even then, state legislatures have final authority to override the popular vote or even refuse to hold popular elections for Electors. This is the result of language in Article II of the Constitution and a Supreme Court decision from 1877 that was codified by Congress in 1887.
The actual presidential election occurs in December when the Electors meet in their respective state capitals to vote. Suppose Trump is referring to that election.
I’m not going to speculate as to what would cause a new “December election.” It might be something from the Supreme Court or a military move under the Laws of War to remove the current government on grounds of treason. The latter would be messy.
This is where state legislatures withdrawing their Biden electors would come into play. It would involve both a major scandal that outrages the public and the willingness of MAGA state legislators to withdraw Biden electors in spite of threats from BLM, Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club, unions and other ne’er-do-wells. It would also require MAGA governors to be willing to call out the National Guard to keep the forces of chaos at bay, even to refusing to allow federalization of the Guard by the current president.
With Biden electors withdrawn and thus no winner in the Electoral College, we have a contingent election. The House elects the president caucusing by state, and the Senate elects the Vice President. With sufficient majorities in both Houses, we end up with Trump restored to office.
As to whether anything done by the previous administration is valid, the Supreme Court will have to decide.
Good
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/31/22 Vol.421, Q Day 1866, smileyface wrote: So it’s ok to post Cates’ stuff to the thread and discuss it?
Yes. I do ask that ultra long posts of any content topic be strategically posted to shorten the length.Perhaps excerpt a portion that best captures the overall content and put a link to the rest of the post in Festival? This is to save computer scroll wheels and keep phone users from giving up on thread content because it takes them so much longer to scroll past posts.
In general, I think content should be posted to FR to reserve it in case it's deleted at the source, but not all of it has to be on the active thread.
Join in with prayer for our nation and FRens.
3:15 Eastern.
The LORD is righteous in all his ways and loving toward all he has made. The LORD is near to all who call on him in truth.
Psa. 145: 17-18
ThankQ, dear bitt! Likewise!
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la RĂ©publique! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
I’m betting Witch Hazel would do the trick.
So I can post material on the active thread related to Jessie Czebotar or discussions related to Juan O Savin, as long as ther are not too long?
Trump’s fault. He PUSHED them to release the vaccine. Mark me.
If you ever have links to Bannon’s war room I’d love it, I have a hard time finding it! I like to post on twtter.
The Khazarian Mafia to put it bluntly. The face of the millennia old enterprise is currently the World Economic Forum, aka Muther WEFers.
Scott is motivating people who may be getting complacent (I’ve seen’t it).
So be offended, nothing happens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.