Replies

Infectious Disease ping - Scientific evidence and consequences of 'the jab' for Covid ( includes both Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”)
The article includes microscopic evidence in blood samples as found in dark-field microscopy
Note that 1,006 participants were referred to the study after experiencing some type of medical disorder, and is not a result of 'random sample'

" An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”)
revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” (Emphasis mine)
In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes."

"The study began in March 2021.
Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders
after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

"Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis
after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.
The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection. "

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” (Emphasis mine) In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes."

Be aware that that journal uses normative science. It’s not okay when the government does that, and it’s not okay when a private entity does that.