Replies

“Other legitimate opinions on how to respond exist “

~~~~~~~

How is that not my point?

Resistance is NOT futile. The time that we had to remain caged is past.

Truth CAN be discussed beyond the trees without banishment. Even Q Truth.

I’ve been doing it for how long?

And please try not to insult me by trying to make it about sympathy, instead of facts.

What happened to you, and Jim? What would the Jim we knew, do, if he could?

~Easy

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/18/22 Vol.419, Q Day 1853, EasySt wrote:
“Other legitimate opinions on how to respond exist “
~~~~~~~
How is that not my point?
Resistance is NOT futile. The time that we had to remain caged is past.
Truth CAN be discussed beyond the trees without banishment. Even Q Truth.
I’ve been doing it for how long?
And please try not to insult me by trying to make it about sympathy, instead of facts.
What happened to you, and Jim? What would the Jim we knew, do, if he could?
~Easy
Bagster has been posting Q content in the forum for months and I don't see him criticizing us ('allowing evil to claim more souls':example, wanting others to be purged for speaking up: example) for not participating the way he wants us to, or exhorting us not to 'cower in the dark.' Somehow he can argue with HG in the forum and leave us out of it. How is this not obvious?
I just can't figure out why the objections you have to HG's posts in the forum have to be firmly established and exhorted again and again on the one thread he's least likely to post on. He doesn't exactly like me or the content/sources I post and I don't update everyone on the Q thread about it. The rest of us handle it without repeated reaching out for Q thread support, over and over again, or dramatizing threats to leave.
At your link, you provide the history of the 'skirmish' beteen you and HG and all are links to forum threads (history). You have fights in the forum - fight them in the forum.
Your continuous updates and recruitment efforts are disruptive.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/03/22 Vol.416, Q Day 1841, EasySt wrote:
I don’t want them out. I would prefer them aware, and on our side.
Well, you're done with that now, right? Because some agree (and have decided to support your forum effort), some don't agree (and won't support it) etc. and simply repeating your complaints and/or trying to shame people into supporting them (e.g., 'cowaring in the darkness') is not going to work.
How many people on the Q threads have, by now extended sympathy and encouragement to you re your updates and threat to leave? How much will be enough? How much do you need?

What happened to you, and Jim?
____________________________________________________

The implication that there’s something wrong with ransomnote or that she has changed from one thing into something lesser is unkind, uncalled for and, frankly, out of line. She has a different opinion on the best way to handle bullies and trolls and many of us agree with her. We have no idea what she had to go through with Jim or the mods to keep this thread alive for so many years and she deserves nothing but our respect, support and admiration. She has all of that and more from me. Nothing happened to ransomnote.