Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: airborne
Most likely because the search warrant is unconstitutionally VAGUE & OVERBROAD, and effectively allows a fishing expedition. For example, if they get a search warrant to look for a stolen TV, they are definitely not allowed to look in your wife's underwear drawer. Theres no way the item could be in there. Items being sought must be described with particularity.

They had to search out a known incompetent magistrate that would not read it and simply rubber-stamp it

24 posted on 08/15/2022 10:45:57 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: jpp113

Reinhart knew what this was and was more than happy to sign off on it. Probably knew about it ahead of time and volunteered to be on duty that day for it.


25 posted on 08/15/2022 10:55:06 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson