In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 08/13/22 Vol.418, Q Day 1851, generally wrote: I agree 100% that he doesn’t need to be arrested for that. But if he is arrested, it removes all the derp arguments. If Trump is not arrested, the derps are going to be sputtering and saying “but, but, but, you can’t do that. Don’t you know who I am? .... etc. By arresting Trump, it completely neutralizes all such objections. It completely neutralizes all excuses for riots. (Not that it would completely stop any riots.) It makes the “optics” of arresting derps 1000 times less inflammatory.
Trump didn’t need to be impeached. Trump didn’t need to be censored. MAL didn’t need to be raided. Lots of things didn’t *need* to happen. But the fact that they did changes the “optics”.
JMO. YMMV.
I believe President Trump's assertions that the raid was inappropriate, and the removal or 'theft' of his passport is wrong are some of the reasons why he would never then turn around and do these things to the Deep Staters (45 won't do the wrong things they do).
I think his being arrested would have too many negatives for both sides, and would be a worst case scenario. The Deep Staters's lives hang in the balance and they can't be trusted to enact detention/control over him even for 5 seconds (Epstein)- why let them enact that lawlessness? Why comply with their lawless pursuits? They have no basis for arresting him - why let them get away with it?
There is a wealth of evidence implicating the Deep Staters in countless treasonous actions and the White Hats can prove it, and thereby give the public justification. The public has already seen that after investigating him, slandering him, censoring him, impeaching him, raiding him etc., they've got nothing on him.
Just my 2 pesos.
Agree 188%