little jeremiah wrote:
“
These are all thoughts and comments of the Telegrammers.
I personally do not think Trump will get arrested. He would be defenseless in their hands, and they would kill him one way or the other. Obviously the enemy wants to arrest him, but I are sure (we’ll see) that the team will not allow this to happen. Whether he leaves the country on a military plane, or arrests etc start first, something.
Second, people seeing a connection between a possible Trump arrest and the famous Q drop, it would not fit. Any indictment with charges against Trump would be all lies, so it would not trigger mass awakening. And if he were to be arrested, it would not verify action nor confirm future direction - clearly meant of the Q plan.
3716
Dec 17, 2019 5:03:45 PM EST
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 4e4d4a No. 7538264
FIRST INDICTMENT [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening.
First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction.
They will fight but you are ready.
Marker [9].
Q
“
ThankQ for the info, LJ!
That, plus what Levin said about Espionage Records and obstruction acts not applying to Presidents, means the indictment is of someone other than PDJT.
Another former prez or secy of state?
Because I’m brain damaged, I have this link up but wherefrom it came? This thread? Telegram? TS? anyway, here it is. Not about the Espionage stuff. But witnesses?? In a search warrant?? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot??
DOJ says release of Mar-a-Lago affidavit would harm ongoing criminal probe
Feds are worried about witnesses and threats to the FBI if more details are released from the search warrant.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/15/doj-mar-a-lago-affidavit-trump-criminal-probe-00051977
The Justice Department intends to unseal additional documents connected to the FBI search at President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate but is urging a federal court to maintain the secrecy of the sworn affidavit describing the basis for the search.
The DOJ is particularly concerned that the release of details from the affidavit might harm ongoing efforts to interview witnesses, given the threats to federal agents in wake of the Mar-a-Lago search.
“If disclosed, the affidavit would serve as a roadmap to the government’s ongoing investigation, providing specific details about its direction and likely course, in a manner that is highly likely to compromise future investigative steps,” U.S. Attorney Juan Gonzalez and Justice Department counterintelligence chief Jay Bratt said in a filing urging the continued secrecy of the affidavit.
“The fact that this investigation implicates highly classified materials further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and exacerbates the potential for harm if information is disclosed to the public prematurely or improperly,” the DOJ officials wrote.
Instead, DOJ is urging the court to unseal a redacted document that includes additional filings connected to the search warrant, including a cover sheet, DOJ’s motion to seal the warrant on Aug. 5 and the judge’s sealing order issued the same day.
Among DOJ’s concerns about releasing the underlying information is that witnesses might stop cooperating, particularly “given the high-profile nature of this matter.”
“Disclosure of the government’s affidavit at this stage would also likely chill future cooperation by witnesses whose assistance may be sought as this investigation progresses, as well as in other high-profile investigations,” Gonzalez and Bratt say, adding “This is not merely a hypothetical concern, given the widely reported threats made against law enforcement personnel in the wake of the August 8 search.”
[more at the filthy rotten Politico link]
Ol' Eau de Cabbage-and-Urine, a/k/a the Benghazi Butcheress gets my vote (if I had my druthers).