State rights might be a case study for me to start a repair of my opinion.
When those state Appeal Courts, followed by the US SC, denied standing to state voters, and to Candidate Trump in one or two
cases, Pious Pence was given no small amount of cover, I certainly concede.
American apathy played a role through the whole process, Until... 6 January, where the people there were a show of conviction of patriotic and state rights Americans assembling for Redress of grievances.
On that day, communist rule with its own stasi enforcement, all conceived by DS & Pelosi, was what was rubber stamped and codified by Pious Pence.
The Republic is determined only by good people only as long as they can keep it.
So far, the people did not keep it. The question is how or, If we “Come and take it” back.
I don’t even know
a senator or representative who wants to “scream to high heaven”, nevermind to activily bring to the US Senate rules & electoral table, the clearer and clearer fact of perpetration against the US, in an ACT OF WAR.
That alone is my only feeble argument to which the pious Pence should have answered, well before rubber stamping it.
How could he do it, in good conscience?
I get it. we watched the steal happen before our very eyes.
What do you do when legal refuses to hear your case?
I keep waiting for Pres. Trump to tell us where in the law VP Pence had the power to reject fraudulently chosen electors. (Which ones were those ?)The law states just the opposite.
Pence was in a no-win situation. He would have been in worse shape should he have gone down the path Pres. Trump wanted him to take.
I am reminded that Katherine Harris’s saving grace in the 2000 Bush v Gore was she followed the law...and did it with Democrat legal advice.