To: Disestablishmentarian
Speaking of Azimov, wasn’t it Azimov who came up with
“The First Law of Robotics”?
With all the buzz about the rise of AI, I’ve been wondering why I haven’t heard anyone mention it.
934 posted on
07/31/2022 4:02:17 PM PDT by
Chuckster
(Friends don't let friends eat farmed fish)
To: Chuckster
“The First Law of Robotics”?
THE RUMBA SAYS “WE DON NEED NO STINKIN LAWS...”
999 posted on
07/31/2022 6:41:50 PM PDT by
bitt
( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
To: Chuckster
Speaking of Azimov, wasn’t it Azimov who came up with “The First Law of Robotics”? With all the buzz about the rise of AI, I’ve been wondering why I haven’t heard anyone mention it.
Yes, actually, the Three Laws of Robotics. Years later, during the merge of the Robotic Series and the Foundation Series, he added the zeroth law, which superseded the original three.
First Law: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
Second Law: A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
Third Law: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Zeroth Law: A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
1,022 posted on
07/31/2022 7:37:25 PM PDT by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson