I never suggested they did. I was merely pointing out that these things are always based on the best information we have at the time.
I did feel that your responses were pedantic. I felt that you were challenging astro-mechanics with the logic of, “but no one REALLY knows.”
That type of logic is usually used by folks who already have a pretty “set” idea of how things work. It is not a leap to take that to mean that “God’s hand” or “God’s work” is the basis of the argument.
As I also wrote, this stuff doesn’t much matter to me. I find the “science” of it interesting. You challenge the premise, but add no thoughts of your own. That is not a discussion.
I’ll say one last comment and I hope I will be understood. Comprehension is always difficult when two or more minds seek the truth. What mankind knows fills one page of one book. What is unknown fills infinite books in infinite libraries (imho)
Btw thanks for the insults (smile)