[bagster]

It was just an example of a topic.

It's all the same, man who does not understand 'Q World'. Take any topic and there will be different takes and theories. Ideas get tossed around and spit-balled by the entirety of 'Q World'.

Then noodniks like you (and the bumpkin Humblegunner) come along and cherry-pick the goofiest theory and hold it up as 'what Q World believes'. It is a sub-intelligent tactic and makes you look like cro-magnon man.

Wouldn't you prefer to walk upright?

[EasySt]

A nearly perfect example of a topic for this discussion, though.

SOME of the topics, like those continuing to come from AINO’s, (Anons in
name only) that are contrary to clearly certain Q proclamations, such as the
JFK Jr. one certainly was, may have a purpose OTHER than illumination within
Q-world.

(They may be worried about our detractors running short of things to point at.)

~Easy

[humblegunner]

come along and cherry-pick the goofiest theory and hold it up as 'what Q World believes'.

But mama... that's where the fun is.