Chief Justice Earl Warren, while much too Liberal, was a man with 20+ years of experience as a prosecutor, and unimpeachable integrity. When his own father was murdered, as Alameda County prosecutor he ordered the only suspect released due to insufficient evidence, and the crime was never solved. He was also, as everyone knew at that time, a personal friend of JFK. So when LBJ insisted that Earl Warren lead the investigation he was making a statement: “I know what you are all thinking, but I didn’t do it”. Robert F Kennedy was Attorney General of the USA at the time, and said and did nothing to indicate he thought there was a coverup of his brother’s murder.
I know it is difficult for people to accept that a nobody-loser like Oswald could change the course of history. But just as recently occurred in Japan with the Shinzo Abe assassination, these things unfortunately do happen. The only country immune to such events is Switzerland, with their 7 member executive council.
JFK assassination conspiracy theories have become a profit-making industry that will never die, like belief in aliens at Roswell. There will never be a lack of gullible people who believe such things, but I am not one of them. I go by the evidence.
If you ever want to discuss real conspiracies and coverups, the Clintons had more than one. And of course James Earl Ray likely had help escaping, perhaps from his family which is why he never talked.
A vast conspiracy to kill a US President requires total silence by all involved, even to their death. It’s just not possible. You can do that with state secrets but not vast numbers of people involved with killing a US President or shooting down a jet airliner.
There will never be a lack of gullible people who believe such things, but I am not one of them. I go by the evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I believe The Select Committee on Assassinations also went by the evidence. Are you assuming that they too were gullible?
Findings of the Select Committee on Assassinations in the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Tex., November 22, 1963
Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President.
The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.
What ‘evidence’ is there that Oswald did it, then?
There is far more evidence that other people did it.
Starting with Oswald being seen in the cafeteria one minute after the shooting. No gunpower residue on his hands. No fingerprints on the rifle. Misaligned sights on the rifle. Inability of anyone - even EXPERT sharpshooters- being able to reproduce the shots. AND missing shots. There were more than 4 shots recorded.
I know they SAY that a sharpshooter replicated the shots... but they don’t tell you that a half-dozen tried, and the only one that was able to do it only did so after 17 failed attempts.