Perhaps you should look it up.
Merriam-Webster.
Definition of “nauseous”:
1 : causing nausea or disgust
2 : affected with nausea or disgust
The irony of your nauseating condescension in the context of wrongly correcting my use of the word “nauseous” is quite hilarious.
Oh, and I didn’t say the so-called “vaccines” caused AIDS or anything else. I don’t think they do squat. I was merely saying that anything causing you to have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, causes you to have AIDS, by definition.
You are completely incorrect. At least on the definition of AIDS. Further there is no evidence that the vaccination process causes any immunosuppression except in the wild fantasies of those hoping that there will be mayhem and destruction from something they were opposed to simply for the hope of being proven correct.
As for AIDS. AIDS is a specific constellation of signs and symptoms marking advanced infection with HIV-1 or less often HIV-2 viral infections. AIDS is specifically diagnosed with the onset of opportunistic infections such as PCP (pneumocystis caranii) or other diseases such as Kaposi’s Sarcoma. If we use the definition of AIDS advanced on this ridiculous thread, then you must be prepared to say anyone with renal disease, on steroids, or with a myriad of other diseases or on medication must also have AIDS.
Those who support this notion are nothing more than typical liberals who try to redefine the language to control the narrative. Well, that doesn’t wait is being said, true. I Choose not to let anyone use an incorrect definition to either mislead people or attempt to justify their errors.
As for nauseous….the accepted definition is that which induces nausea. Often when someone tells me they are nauseous, I tend to agree.
Be well.