Replies

A personal message from Clandestine:

https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/why-the-emergence-of-substack

Why the Emergence of Substack?

Clandestine

This isn’t news or analysis, I’m just going to be personal with you all for a moment.

I’m seeing lots of chatter and feedback about displeasure with independent journalists using Substack, and accepting donations/paid subscriptions.

So I’m going to address my particular situation and perhaps shed a little light on what many citizen journalists are experiencing, and why I myself started a Substack.

Firstly, my Substack articles do not have a pay wall. They are free, and always will be free. Paid subscribers are merely donating for my work.

And to clarify, this is not a side gig for me. This is my job. This is my only source of income. Out of necessity. Because I can’t get a job in the public world.

Not everyone knows this, but my name is tied to this whole thing. Go ahead and Google “Jacob Creech”. The first articles are hit pieces from Daily Beast and ADL, smearing me as a conspiracy theorist for my reporting on the biolabs in Ukraine (Reporting that turned out to be 100% correct). Every background check for any job application, that’s the first thing they see. Companies view me as a liability.

Also, I’ve never been a “journalist”. I was in the Army, I worked for a Google partner company, I managed restaurants and wineries. I’m just a dude who noticed what was going on and is really good at articulating it, and spent years honing the craft. That’s it. I have zero professional experience in the field.

But now I find myself in a situation where my ability to generate income is solely tied to my reporting, which for years was simply a hobby. Now I don’t have a choice. This is all I have. Saying I have “skin” in the game, is a vast understatement. My life in many ways depends on it.

And if you all want to know how much I’m making, here are my numbers:

[image]

As of today I have 11,900 total Substack subscribers. 509 of them are paid subscribers at $5 a month or $50 a year. Meaning 12% of you all here on Telegram are free subscribers and 0.5% of you all are paid subscribers.

My annual revenue as of now is just above $27,000 a year. After Substack takes 10% and Stripe takes 3%, that leaves me roughly $24,000 net a year. Which I am extremely thankful for.

You all have no idea how thankful I am for the support, but it’s not enough to live off of as of yet. I’ve been using my savings to stay alive until I can generate enough income to make a liveable wage. I just want to make it abundantly clear that I’m not making a fortune off of fellow Patriots.

I knew what I was doing when I stepped into the fray, and I knew the consequences of my actions. I will own them until the day I die and I shall do so proudly. I will never stop providing accurate reporting, because I truly believe I am making a positive impact on the world.

But how can I claim to be saving the world, and charge a fee? I couldn’t. Therefore I won’t. So I offer everything for free, as well as the ability for you all to donate if you so choose. And to the gracious souls who are willing to donate I am forever grateful.

I hoped this provides some clarity for all the people out there who don’t like what I’m doing, and throw around the term “paytriot”. Please understand that everything I provide is for free, and I’ve sacrificed more than most to provide accurate Intel that the media refuses to cover from across the globe.

I spend my days translating Ukrainian and Russian news, patrolling wide variety of echo chambers, and compiling the most pertinent stories to the global awakening. If you’d like to thank me, please consider donating. If you don’t want to, I completely understand, I still want you to enjoy my content, but please don’t make false claims like I’m a grifter or a paytriot.

I preach transparency and I will practice it as well.

Respectfully,

-Clandestine

And for those who like Technofog; problem is there are many images and some video clips so to get the full thing clicky the linky.

Biden’s Mental Decay

https://technofog.substack.com/p/bidens-mental-decay

The President of the sole global superpower is confounded by a teleprompter. The Commander in Chief of the most powerful military in the world, with 700+ military spanning the globe and nearly 4,000 nuclear warheads, can barely make it through public appearances.

He wouldn’t pass a driver’s test, unable to distinguish between a pedestrian or a stop sign. But he has his finger on the nuclear trigger.

Just this week he was defeated (yet again) by text on a screen. “End of quote. Repeat the line.” Watch this:

Twitter avatar for @greg_price11
Greg Price
@greg_price11
Joe Biden accidentally reads the part on the teleprompter that says “repeat the line” when they wanted him to say the line again lmfao
July 8th 2022

Then there was the cover-up. One can imagine the emergency meeting of White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, et al. They’re already dealing with record inflation, a tanking stock market, and the economy on a verge of a recession. What do they say to that? They claim the US is “stronger economically than we have been in history,”

And now they’re left with this mess to clean up. They’re probably thankful, in a way. Another Biden public screw-up is a welcome relief compared to addressing formula shortages. They’ve handled his gaffes before. To the rescue was Assistant White House Press Secretary Emilie Simons to cover for her boss. She falsified Biden’s statement, begging the public to ignore the words from Biden’s mouth.

Emilie Simons
@EmilieSimons46
@greg_price11 No. He said, “let me repeat that line.”
July 8th 2022

The official White House website has doubled-down on the denial of reality, making up words that were never said to protect a President who may not be able to remember what he had for breakfast.

This isn’t Biden’s first public embarrassment, and it certainly won’t be his last. Those who have been paying close attention know they’re a regular occurrence. There will be another one in a few days. His public appearances are, for the most part, heavily scripted and before a friendly audience. Say a few words and talk to some folks before making an exit. And President Biden isn’t up to the challenge, vanquished by the easiest parts of his presidency.

There was the time he tried to “shake thin air” after a speech and walked off stage bewildered, unsure of where to go.

Or, recall his fumbled introduction of Judge Ketanji Jackson. “America is a nation that can be defined in a single word: ASUFUTIMAEHAEHUTBW.”

And when he was rescued from questions on foreign policy by the Easter Bunny.

And when Biden checked his notes to answer a question about Russia in a staged appearance at a general store.

Apparently he goes nowhere without the paper crutch prepared by his handlers. Issues relating to Russia - from the war in Ukraine to the expansion of NATO, etc. - are certainly briefed to the President on a daily basis. And his memory is so bad, his intellect is so defeated, that he cannot recall his constant briefing.

If you need further proof of his mental state, there’s this “cheat sheet,” where he is instructed on how and when to enter the room and leave the room.

“YOU enter the Roosevelt room…”

“YOU take your seat.”

“YOU depart.”

Joe Biden cheat sheet gives detailed instructions to take seat, keep comments to 2 minutes | news.com.au —
The troubling thing is that most of the presidency is off-script.

How do you address inflation and families being priced-out of groceries when you struggle through a press conference?

How do you formulate a strategy about China or Russia when you rely on a cheat sheet for a 5-minute meeting?

Make no mistake, Biden’s senility is one of the biggest stories in the world. The media’s silence on this matter is telling. Never before has the press tried to so hard to ignore so big a story (I venture this is bigger than Hunter’s laptop), as they’re afraid of what a correct assessment of Biden’s facilities might reveal. Ask whether Dementia-in-Chief is a threat to national security or economic recovery.

Also revealing is the media’s attempts to explain-away or otherwise repackage Biden’s mental and physical deficiencies. Peter Baker, writing for The New York Times, says Biden’s “age has increasingly become an uncomfortable issue for him, his team and his party.” Of course, Biden’s age isn’t the issue per se - it’s Biden’s mind. “Age” is just The New York Times’ way of being polite, of serving the Biden Administration.

To make matters worse, there was the unbelievable “uniform” reporting of Biden’s competence by those interviewed by Baker:

In interviews, some sanctioned by the White House and some not, more than a dozen current and former senior officials and advisers uniformly reported that Mr. Biden remained intellectually engaged, asking smart questions at meetings, grilling aides on points of dispute, calling them late at night, picking out that weak point on Page 14 of a memo and rewriting speeches like his abortion remarks on Friday right up until the last minute.

Those comments by Biden’s closest advisors and Democrat officials are certainly contrasted by how they treat Biden, and Baker unfortunately makes no effort to push-back on that point. As Baker concedes: “He stays out of public view at night and has taken part in fewer than half as many news conferences or interviews as recent predecessors.”

“Out of public view at night.” Could it be because Biden struggles with sundowning, which causes confusion, aggression, anxiety, and depression? Baker doesn’t ask.

But - if you have any concerns about Biden’s health or acuity - don’t worry. The New York Times has found experts that “put Mr. Biden in a category of ‘super-agers’ who remain unusually fit as they advance in years.”

Sadly, Baker doesn’t challenge that conclusion either. And what an easy challenge it would have been.

There’s the old cliché that journalists must speak truth to power. As Chomsky once observed, speaking truth to power is pointless because the powerful already know the truth. Better to speak truth to the powerless. As to Biden’s age-related failures - dare I say dementia - the press has chosen to avoid speaking the truth to the power and the powerless.

How much it matters is another story. This is likely a one-term president and the public is seeing Biden’s real-time deterioration for themselves.

But - if the press is willing to cover-up Biden’s dementia - then what other stories are they euthanizing?