To: ransomnote
Honest and dumb question from an outsider - if this isn't an appropriate topic of conversation, please ignore.
Heard that Q recently started posting again. Was wondering:
1. After the initial couple posts, did Q continue with new posts?
2. Is the general consensus that the posts are legit?
Thanks!
25 posted on
07/09/2022 2:20:23 PM PDT by
cibco
To: Observator
They are authentic. Who knows if/when Q will post more.
26 posted on
07/09/2022 2:20:55 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
To: Observator
1. 5 new posts, 1st on 6-24, last on 6-29. No posts since 6-29.
2. Many think posts are legit, for some it is "wait and see".
38 posted on
07/09/2022 2:41:32 PM PDT by
TruthWillWin
(Joe is not my POTUS)
To: Observator
No consensus on if at all. You live in a shadow world. If you find something along whether or not it is real or not in your research that you do. Please let us know.
44 posted on
07/09/2022 2:50:20 PM PDT by
CJ Wolf
( what is scarier than offensive words? Not being able to say them. )
To: Observator
Heard that Q recently started posting again. Was wondering: ,p>1. After the initial couple posts, did Q continue with new posts? 2. Is the general consensus that the posts are legit?
The jury is still out. It ranges from 10-20% Q is back; to 90% Q is back.
I'm at about 15%
One thing is sure. A bunch of people have tried posting over there and spoofing Q lately using various tricks to get Q in their post name.
I'm waiting and seeing.
80 posted on
07/09/2022 4:04:16 PM PDT by
The Toddler
(He that tooteth not his own horn; The same shall not be tooted.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson