O.K. her personal story is wierd.
Granted.
But, IF the kind of situation she desrcibed was true, for any woman, when her and the doctors are faced with losing both of her twins, or saving one, I would agree with their saving one, just as I would agree with saving the life of the mother if it’s an either or sitution. It is bad enough when a woman knows she is alive only because the doctor’s saved her life by aborting the baby. It would be worse for the motherless child to grow up learning her mother is gone because her life was saved. It is a burden either way when both lives are at stake.
I don’t think that those kind of situations are abortions they are medical procedures to save the life of Mother or of one of the fetuses.
While there may need to be some fine tuning the situation seems very like the separation of conjoined twins where one may or is likely to die but saving one is perhaps all that can be achieved in a particular case. Very wrenching, very difficult but does not run a foul of laws against murder. Some fetal conditions may fall under the same category.
Okay, fine. Have the procedure. But I’d expect an actual Republican to be saddened by the fact that she to resort to this horrific act. Instead she “became” a NARAL lobbyist who also did work with the ACLU. She also drags this story out every time abortion is threatened.
She can be a brain dead liberal who kills her own baby if she wants to be. But she can’t pretend to be a Republican who has “seen the light” about abortion. Once she does that, it’s open season on her drama, IMO.