Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Q ANON / THE STORM — A 120 YEAR TIMELINE
A Crash Course about the Conspiracy to Save the World

https://www.realhistorychan.com/uploads/1/3/3/8/133840286/qbook-converted.pdf


226 posted on 07/03/2022 7:30:07 PM PDT by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: numberonepal

Looks interesting.


308 posted on 07/04/2022 12:01:06 AM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

To: numberonepal

Interesting article. I’m about halfway through it and I agree with its general outline. But the author draws some incorrect conclusions on some points, IMO. While I find it plausible that Globalists conspired to have the U.S. enter WWII, the author’s portrayal of Hitler and Hirohito as victims has to be countered. Would Hitler have preferred Britain and the U.S. not declared war on Germany? Sure. But the war in Europe was sparked by NAZI aggression, not U.S. or U.K. aggression, even if the U.S. and U.K. entering the war when they did escalated things more quickly. The exact goals of WWII for the Globalists are not completely clear. Certainly, the desire to make obscene amounts of money from the war was a big part of it, and Henry Ford was a perfect example of a U.S. industrialist who made money financing both the Allied and the Axis war machines, and yet the author cites Ford as an “anti-Globalist businessman/patriot”. That simply doesn’t jibe with the historical record.

Also, the author’s rush to declare Eisenhower as a black hat is a little premature in my opinion. There is conflicting evidence regarding Eisenhower and the author’s conclusion that Eisenhower’s military industrial complex speech was not what it appeared to be needs more evidence before it can be asserted with certainty.

All in all, an interesting read that gives a good outline of significant events in the Globalists rise to power over the past 120 years. Unfortunately, the author gets carried away at times and draws conclusions that are based on speculation, not facts. Kind of reminds me of the Prussia-Gate essays in which the author highlighted some interesting relevant facts and then let his imagination handle the rest.


321 posted on 07/04/2022 1:03:29 AM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson