“That’s funny, everyone with first-hand knowledge says she IS lying.”
My understanding is that she testified that she was repeating what she had been told by someone else, who heard about the incident from an alleged witness — double hearsay. Although the underlying story is false, she is not lying if she simply repeats what she was told without claiming first-hand knowledge.
Of course, in a judicial or other adversarial proceeding where due process, rules of evidence, and cross-examination are essential to the integrity of the proceeding, Hutchinson’s hearsay and double hearsay testimony would have never been admitted into evidence.
This whole show is a laughable charade. The fact that anyone in the media plays along with it is a pathetic statement on the state of our news, or so called news.