Q&A
[ppupperdo] so, i’m confused...was it Q or not?
Why yes, yes it is; why do you ask?
[RitaNotOk] re : .'s
That is a false memory of 'no sentence ending' periods. Period. Love your writing tho!
[LJ] Some people think the new Q is the real Q, some don’t.
Better stated: Austists believe this is real Q, some (follower) and some (paytriot) people don't.
[farce] The legitimacy of the new Q posts is to be determined.
Alternate 1:
The legitimacy of when human life is viable is to be determined.
Alternate 2:
The legitimacy of the 2020 Presidential Election is to be determined.
Better: the legitimacy of the new Q posts is self-evident by forward looking game theory, outside of time.
This includes multiple instances of open and transparent handshaking, a hardware milspec upgrade, and software black box component delivery the world witnessed online as it happened.
Anons were prepared for this. It is what it is.
[LJ] Jim Watkins thinks he is the real Q, will report more tomorrow.
Better: For obvious reasons, BO has no access or key to the compartmentally separated infosec package which segregates Q authentication and encryptions; both input and output. We expect BO to report that 'apparently, this is...', 'no protocols were breached' etc.
With respect to opinion, comfort, 'safe spaces', and risk management, the above is not derived from an opinion or 'follow'; but a true interpretation of events witnessed by the world in real-time which eventually and transparently secured comms to the bread.
WRWY
