Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

I believe if Kathy had the time and money - which she would have got - she would do a lot better than Oz.

Bear in mind he is well known, has the $$$ and is down 9 points already.

Not a great start for him is it ?


17 posted on 06/20/2022 3:16:42 AM PDT by RandFan (For some reason I'm interested in politics, particularly the U.S. Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: RandFan
"Bear in mind he is well known, has the $$$ and is down 9 points already."

9 points you say?

In a Suxfolk Poll you say?

L. O. F. L.


21 posted on 06/20/2022 3:20:03 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

You make good points in an art setting. The reality is as you say, he has the name recognition and is backed by sufficient $$$.

Trump’s endorsement was based on PRACTICAL considerations.

I would guess Trump’s people didn’t bring funds to Barnett’s campaign because of the Philadelphia risk

Oz has more leverage in Philadelphia than Barnett and Philadelphia has a controlling influence over PA.

It’s a practical matter.

Barnett in a more conservative state would be the Trump choice


37 posted on 06/20/2022 4:02:50 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson