Apparently you are having difficulty following the flow of the conversation. I said that what the man did (putting the planter there) was probably his mechanism for grieving.
This is clear to me. What the man did was to put that planter there to memorialize his fiance. That is his action. That is the thing which he did.
That's the context. I said it was probably his mechanism for grieving.
You said "for over a year"?
Yes, he was coping for over a year by putting those planter boxes on her grave.
Putting those planter boxes on her grave was his mechanism for grieving.
We weren't talking about any other thing he did "for over a year."
So I didn't take you out of context, you apparently lost the context.
Call it what you want but at least admit you falsely accused.
Because I must have known you were referring to something other than the planters when you said "for over a year"? What would this other thing be that you were referring to?
What thing did you mean when you said "for over a year?"
“This is clear to me. What the man did was to put that planter there to memorialize his fiance. That is his action. That is the thing which he did.
That’s the context. I said it was probably his mechanism for grieving.
You said “for over a year”?
You just proved you lied.
Planters, plural
Grieving
Nowhere did I say one player was there for a year.