No it doesn't.
As Abraham Lincoln said, "Just because you call a tail a leg, doesn't make it so."
Everyone knows what "litter" is. You take a million people and run them past that grave, and if you ask them "Is that litter?" They will say "no."
Your "definition" would require "Jury Instructions" in order to reach the notion that it is "litter".
It is a Frankenstein creation of legal people that bears no resemblance to reality.
A better argument would be to claim "trespass" as Ford is the owner of the grave. Calling it "litter" is just stupid.
“A better argument would be to claim “trespass” as Ford is the owner of the grave. Calling it “litter” is just stupid.”
That is the law. You challenged me to cite the law and obliged you. I posted it to you and you acknowledged that post.
“Calling it “litter” is just stupid.”
You take a million people and run them past that grave, and if you ask them “Is that litter?” They will say “no.”
I didn’t call it that, the law did. I just posted it.
“Your “definition” would require “Jury Instructions” in order to reach the notion that it is “litter”.
I posted the source, argue with them. I don’t write the laws.
Why question me? I gave you what the law said, what was done, and why the judge determined it that way. If you don’t like it, call your congressman if it’s your state. I’m not from Alabama, and I have absolutely no remorse for the guy’s problem as he was warned and still did it knowing it was illegal. The law said what it was, and took action based upon how they interpret the law in the state. Neither you nor I have a pony in the race. I only thought it was interesting. It’s now getting ridiculous.
I don’t care what all those people you’d try to find to make a judgement whether it’s litter or not have to say. That means nothing. The only one that counts is the law until the law is changed. And if they want, to go up channel until it makes the Supreme Court and they won’t entertain it because it is so cut and dry, it’s a waste of money and time. Mine, too. Have a good day.
wy69