This was posted here, you had to have read it.
“It is against the law to place items on a gravesite in Alabama unless it is cleared by the family of the deceased.”
And yet you once again IGNORE inconvenient facts. That is called being disingenuous.
“It is against the law to place items on a gravesite in Alabama unless it is cleared by the family of the deceased.”
So why wasn't the guy charged with *THAT* statute instead of "littering"?
And yet you once again IGNORE inconvenient facts. That is called being disingenuous.
Just because I don't obsess on the same particular points you find significant doesn't mean I am trying to deceive anyone. I just don't consider your points to be as important as my own.