You have no respect for the owner of this website and attack me!
And you wish judges didn’t follow the law in making their decisions!
Judge in this case: McLaughlin said he has to “rule on the law and facts”
You are doing it again. I have said nothing to disrespect the owner of this website, but you are slanting the conversation to make it appear as though I had.
Is your argument not strong enough on it's own?
And you wish judges didn’t follow the law in making their decisions!
Clearly, you and I have a different understanding of what "THE LAW" should mean.
Is that stuff "litter"? Which to normal people means trash thrown down with no concern for it.
That grave decoration doesn't meet the definition of "litter" in my opinion, so therefore the Judge is *NOT* following the law.
Judge in this case: McLaughlin said he has to “rule on the law and facts”
Which means "Whatever urge I happen to have at the moment."
Objective facts and law have nothing to do with it.
Do you really believe the State Legislature created this law to deal with grave memorial stuff?
Well I think a lot of grave memorial stuff is tacky, and if we just go through the cemetery and toss out everything that *I* consider tacky, it would go way beyond just that one grave.
They are misusing a law in order to deal with a situation that there probably isn't an actual law written to cover.
So don't you believe in the law? Or just when it decides something you like?